Answer:
The correct answer is: Liability.
Explanation:
A liability is an obligation that arises during the course of business. It represents a third party's claim in the company's assets usually from lenders or other creditors. Liability can arise in many different ways. Liabilities can be borrowing or a promise to pay later or any other type of obligation because of past transactions.
The Answer is A Paying attention to detail I just took the Apex test
Answer:
$6,000 unfavorable
Explanation:
The fixed manufacturing overhead budget for the month is the difference between budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead cost minus actual fixed manufacturing overhead cost represented below;
Fixed manufacturing overhead budget = Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead cost - Actual fixed manufacturing overhead cost
= $70,000 - $76,000
= $6,000 unfavorable
It is unfavorable since the actual overhead cost expended is more than the budgeted cost.
Answer: what to expect in an interview session
Explanation:) because good person-organization fit is linked to higher task performance, better work attitudes, lower intentions to quit, and less job stress; and
(2) because showing up at an interview having done your research shows recruiters that you took the time to learn about the business and prepares you to ask good questions. The goal of this exercise is to challenge your knowledge of the seven things you should learn about acompany before showing up for an interview . Every Recruiter expect that you know what you are doing and also brush yourself up with information on your Resume and the company in question
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
