Answer:the United States wildlife service
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Post hoc fallacy.
Explanation:
The post hoc fallacy is an argument based in the fact that an event happens just after the other, in this case it does not mean that just because the historian predicted the fact the result is a consequence of what he said, or that what he said was true. In this order, the fallacy uses the temporal consequence as an argument. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that temporal sequence is naturally part of the causality process.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
the parliament of great britan
Answer:
Correct answer is They were weak and sometimes dishonest.
Explanation:
First option is correct as the Roman Empire, especially western part was very unstable. That was additionally upheld by the fact that most of them since the division of Empire in 395 had no authority and brought many wrong decision.
Second option is not correct as we cannot say that they were popular at all.
Third option is not correct, as one of the ways how we were able to see their incompetence was through the fact that they practically made no reform.
Last option is also not correct as people weren't directly choosing them.
