Ask question

Ask question

All categories

chubhunter [2.5K]

3 years ago

5

Which of the following statements is most likely to be true regarding private ownership?

1 answer:

alex41 [277]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

A. It reduces a nation's dynamism and its increasing investments in innovation and creativity.

Explanation:

Which of the following statements is most likely to be true regarding private ownership?

It reduces a nation's dynamism and

its increases investments in innovation and creativity.

if there are many private ownership companies in the state, it will keep prices down and increases innovation of new ideas and items.

You might be interested in

A local store can print 55,000 papers per hour. How many papers can they print in 5 1/4 hours?

Alchen [17]

To find the answer you need to multiply 55,000 times 5 1/4 that is equal to 68750.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Thornbrough Corporation produces and sells a single product with the following characteristics: Per Unit Percent of Sales Sellin

AfilCa [17]

Answer:

The income will decrease by $21,000

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Selling price $ 220

Variable expenses 44

Contribution margin $ 176

Sales in units= 7,000

Total contribution margin= 7,000*176= $1,232,000

Fixed expenses= ($901,000)

Net operating income= 331,000

Now, with the changes we calculate the new net operating income:

New sales price= $202

New fixed cost= (53,000 + 901,000)= 954,000

New unit sales= 8,000

Net operating income= 8,000*(202 - 44) - 954,000= $310,000

The income will decrease by $21,000

7 0

4 years ago

What was Roosevelt's big stick foreign policy?

ra1l [238]

Roosevelt's "big stick" foreign policy meant that the United States would engage in diplomatic negotiations while retaining the ability to use force if necessary.

<h3>What are some examples of Roosevelt's big stick strategy?</h3>

Numerous instances in foreign affairs, President Roosevelt employed big stick policy. He negotiated a peace deal between Russia and Japan, expanded American influence in Cuba and more.

<h3>How did America benefit from the "big stick" policy?</h3>

Roosevelt was successful in keeping the United States out of wars by threatening legitimately with force under his "big stick" strategy.

<h3>How was the "big stick" approach applied in Panama?</h3>

Roosevelt used the "big stick" to put down the Colombian uprising by aiding the Panamanian people. He dispatched American battleships to the Colombian coast in November 1903 to prevent it from putting down the revolt in Panama.

To know more about big stick, visit:

brainly.com/question/22391573

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

Given the following financial data for Boston Technology, compute the firmâs degree of combined leverage.

Otrada [13]

Answer:

For year 2010

Degree of combined leverage is 3.82

For year 2011

Degree of combined leverage is 4.11

Explanation:

Computing the degree of combined leverage of the firm with the formula stated below as:

Degree of combined leverage = Contribution margin / EBT

where

Contribution margin is computed as:

Contribution margin = Sales - Variable Cost

EBT (Earnings Before tax) is computed as:

EBT = EBIT - Interest

Now, computing the same by applying the formula:

For year 2010

Contribution margin = $700,000 - $406,000

= $294,000

EBT = $119,000 - $42,000

= $77,000

Degree of combined leverage = $294,000 / $77,000

= 3.82

For year 2011

Contribution margin = $760,000 - $448,000

= $312,000

EBT = $122,000 - $46,000

= $76,000

Degree of combined leverage = $312,000 / $76,000

= 4.11

7 0

3 years ago

A rotary engine powers a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) personal aircraft known as the Moller Skycar M400. It is a flying c

makvit [3.9K]

To solve this problem, we first make a chart that shows the spending pattern of $90 million over 23 years.

$90 million at 11% = [math]\frac{90 \times 1.11^{23}}{100}=903.478[/math]. The future worth at the end of the 23-year is approximately $903,478.

Since the problem does not provide a standard amount of time that people usually use to measure interest rates, we can infer that this rate should be 10% per year.

Using 10% per year instead of 11%:

$90 million at 10% = [math]\frac{90 \times 1.10^{23}}{100}=897.507[/math]. The future worth at the end of the 23-year is approximately $897,507.

Since the total amount that was spent on development over a period of 23 years is $90 million and the answer in our problem has to be in millions, we have to adjust the amount.

$90 million x 100 = $9 billion. The future worth at the end of the 23-year is approximately 9 billion dollars.

3 0

3 years ago