Answer:
The Answer is Automobiles.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
<u>Answer:
</u>
In this scenario, there is a high degree of social risk for Len.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The people who are in acquaintance with Len expect him to behave in a more dignified manner which would exhibit his social and economic status.
- The people that he works with believe that the social behavior that Len displays does not suit them because Len does not choose to behave like a dignified, rich individual despite being one.
Answer:
Your answer should be a. outlaws "grease payments".
