The value of 7 in 26..74 is 0.7
The value of 7 in 37.596 is 7.
1/10 the value of 7 in 26.74 is 0.07 and 0.07 ≠ 7.
So, statement a) is incorrect.
1/100 the value of 7 in 26.74 is 0.007 and 0.007 ≠ 7.
So, statement c) is incorrect.
100 times the value of 7 in 26.74 is 70 and 70 ≠ 7.
So, statement d) is incorrect.
10 times the value of 7 in 26.74 is 7 and 7 = 7.
So, statement b) is correct and it correctly compares two values.
80 blocks. 16 block fit at the base of the box and then you multiply 16 by the product of 7.5/1.5. 16 times 5 is 80
Answer:
a. committed a type 1 error
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct option is - a. committed a type 1 error
Reason -
Type 1 error occurs when a true null Hypothesis is rejected
Type 2 error occurs when a false null Hypothesis is accepted
Now,
Let us state that,
The null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis is
H0 : There is no difference between the mean lifetimes of the new and old designs
H1 : There is a difference between the mean lifetimes of the new and old designs
Now,
As there is no difference between the mean lifetimes of the new and old designs.
⇒ The null hypothesis is true.
But p value suggests that null hypothesis should be rejected
∴
We have committed a Type 1 error that is rejecting a true null hypothesis.
So,
The correct option is - a. committed a type 1 error
Interior angles in any triangle sum up to 180 so 180-(30+40)=110
So the exterior angles equals 180-110= 70
70 is the final answer i hope it helps and good luck
Well first you take the amount that Connor paid, $29.25 and subtract the base price for the pizza, $17.50
$29.25 - $17.50 = $11.75
Then you divide that number by the base price of 1 topping, $2.35
11.75 / 2.35 = 5
So Connor got 5 toppings on his pizza.