Answer:
B.mental health professionals could not reliably assess whether mental illness caused criminal behavior
Explanation:
Judge David Bazelon was who proposed to do a scientific exam about mental illness in the criminal area. In the end, his ruling established that the defendant was not responsible for his criminal act if he was suffering from being mentally unstable. However, there is no verifiable certainty that the defendant, because of his illness, committed the crimes.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The ability to process information and multi-task continues to diminish with every drink.
Hope this helps!
Feel free to ask if you have anymore questions!
Lillian in the given case most likely has borderline personality disorder.
More about the borderline personality disorder:
The mental health illness known as borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterised by impulsivity, interpersonal relationship instability, and significant mood swings.
One of the "Cluster B" personality disorders, which are characterised by dramatic and unpredictable behaviours, is borderline personality disorder. Personality disorders are characterised by persistent, rigid, dysfunctional behaviour patterns that cause social problems and discomfort.
Normally by emerging twenties, borderline personality disorder manifests itself. Young adulthood seems to be when the problem is worse, and it may progressively become better as people age.
Learn more about the borderline personality here:
brainly.com/question/6819563
#SPJ4
Answer:
civil case
Explanation:
Diversity jurisdiction includes is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction whereby US district courts (e.g., trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal judiciary) have the power to hear a <u>civil</u> case where the parties are "diverse" in citizenship, indicating that they are citizens of different states or non-U.S. citizens. A dispute between two individuals from two different states is an example of diversity jurisdiction. It is a method federal courts use to gain jurisdiction over a case involving individuals or entities from two different states.