1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klasskru [66]
3 years ago
9

In response to its decision in Daubert, the U.S. Supreme Court created Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.a. Trueb. False

Social Studies
1 answer:
Mrrafil [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they  brought 'an expert'.

To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.

You might be interested in
How would gladiators fit into the culture of the United States and the democratic<br> setting?
Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

Gladiators would have only fitted in the colonial and Pre-Civil War South. In the modern era, they would not fit at all.

This is because gladiators were slaves, who fought battles, often to the dead, against other gladiators, other soldiers, and even wild animals, for the amusement of the Roman Society.

After the Civil War, Gladiators simply do not fit into the culture of the United States and its democratic setting, and the reason is that slavery is prohibited in the United States.

7 0
3 years ago
1. Who among the following is the Head of the Union Government ?
cluponka [151]

Answer:

B) The President of India

Follow me please

Mark brainliest

3 0
2 years ago
When good things happen, Lara takes credit for them, believes that the good things will last, and that they will favorably affec
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

The answer is - Optimistic

Explanation:

Explanatory style is the way in which we explain the events that happen to us in our lives, either good or bad. There is the pessimistic explanatory style and the optimistic explanatory style.

The optimistic explanatory style are characterized by explanations for negative outcomes as being due to unstable, specific and external causes  so we do not blame ourselves 100% for things that go wrong, and that the negative events will end soon and they would not let it affect too many aspects of their lives. While positive outcomes are seen as being due to stable, global and internal causes.

Lara is using optimistic explanatory style therefore she tends to have more positive explanatory style as she takes credit for positive experiences, believes that the good things will last and they will favorably affect other aspects of her life.

3 0
2 years ago
1. Which of the following is NOT a major difference in Hinduism and Islam?
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

C I think

Explanation:

The hindus didn't change the caste system so its not a big difference because they didnt accomplish in changing the caste system. This was just a belief of the hindus im pretty sure

I THINK please wait for more responses if needed.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the years 1788-91, Americans debated whether to ratify the constitution. During this time, the Anti-Federalists engaged i
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

c. A bill of rights was added to the Constitution

Explanation:

During the years 1788-91, Americans debated whether to ratify the constitution. During this time, the Anti-Federalists engaged in many activities to express their viewpoint of the Constitution. Which of the following is a direct outcome of the Anti-Federalist's activities?

A bill of rights was added to the Constitution,Bill of Rights were ratified on December 15, 1791, thus becoming a part of the Constitution which list specific prohibitions on governmental power, in response to calls from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties and its was Anti- Federalists who demanded amendments that would protect individual liberties in order to prevent the federal government from assuming excessive power.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Born into slavery in Maryland
    8·2 answers
  • Name and summarize the four levels of administration necessary to keep human services organization operating
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a method proposed by Rogers to develop a more positive self-concept?
    15·1 answer
  • the government controls the prices of commodities and the way commodities are produced and consumed. what type of economic syste
    7·1 answer
  • What do u think might attract or repel due to electric forces.
    15·2 answers
  • Choose which of these statements is describing a Cultural characteristic.
    14·1 answer
  • The problem with adopting a fair-return pricing policy for a natural monopoly is that
    13·1 answer
  • What is thisssss one
    9·2 answers
  • Do you follow all the orders given by your seniors? Write your answer with reasons.​
    13·2 answers
  • I need help asap on this answer
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!