The answer is B.
Schenk vs US involves a freedom of speech case in which Schenk encouraged American citizens to avoid the military draft during World War I.
The Supreme Court ruled this was not protected free speech because it provides a clear and present danger to American citizens. The court felt that influencing people to not join the war presented a danger to America’s war effort.
Explanation: Yes there were other options but no we didnt use them . you see when the us gets a new toy they like to use them . so either way they would have bombed nagasaki and hiroshima and all that . other options would have been to make a truce or even fight it out with our men
Yes the life appointments of Supreme Court judges affect the way the court works because their are opinions are going to be biased like every human on earth.
Conquering the Norse-held lands of Sweden and Denmark
