What are reasons for American imperialism?

1 answer:

6 0

Economic factors. The US wanted to take an empire to give it new markets in which to sell goods and from which to buy raw materials.

Military factors. This was the time of Alfred Thayer Mahan’s ideas about the dominant role of naval power. The US felt that taking an empire would give it more naval bases from which to project power. This would allow the US to become a more important power.

Cultural factors. Many Americans believed in the idea of the “white man’s burden.” They felt that they needed to go out and help to civilize the rest of the world.

You might be interested in

What is the Tea Party

Andrew [12]

Question: What is the Tea Party?

Options: A. a gathering of democrats in the white house rose garden ; B. a new american political party ; C. A movement of political conservatives ; D. a nickname for the republican-controlled house of representatives

Answer: A movement of political conservatives (option C.)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How are a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court case different?

Tems11 [23]

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.

Explanation:

Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law .

Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which concept of democracy does the statement below define?

LekaFEV [45]

I think the answer is <span>B. equality of all persons</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Identify a necessary part of the process by which legal immigrants become citizens. A. participating in an oath ceremony B. part

makvit [3.9K]

D. Proving existence of employment hope this helps!! :)

8 0