1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tester [92]
3 years ago
14

How did the economic impacts of the Great Depression differ in the United States and in the Soviet Union?

History
1 answer:
Rudik [331]3 years ago
5 0

Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

You might be interested in
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
With the Emancipation Proclamation, the Union took an official stance on:
nalin [4]
The answer is:
A - Slavery
7 0
3 years ago
1. The war of ideas between the Catholic Church and Protestant reformers led to a ___________________.
V125BC [204]

Answer:  Wars waged with weapons

<u>Details/explanation:</u>

The German lands were referred to as "The Holy Roman Empire" in those days.  Immediately following the death of Martin Luther, the prominent German leader of the Protestants, war broke out between the forces of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, and Lutheran princes.  Charles V went  to war against the Lutheran princes in the Smalcald Wars (1546-57) to try to force them back into adherence to Catholicism.  

There were ongoing struggles in the years after that, which affected other territories in which Protestant reformers were active.  There were wars in Swiss territories as well as in France.  Ultimately, the Thirty Years War (1618-1648) was waged in the German territories (aka the Holy Roman Empire) by many of the nations of Europe over religion as well as other issues.  


5 0
2 years ago
Who was the 30th president
Morgarella [4.7K]
Calvin Coolidge was the 30th president
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you could add another right to the Bill of Rights, what would you add and why? Explain your answer.
Oliga [24]

Answer:

An informal survey suggests a desire for greater privacy protections is present among some liberals, conservatives and libertarians.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was responsible for destroying the Spanish fleet at Manila?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the Society of Jesus founded in 1534?
    13·1 answer
  • Please select the correct definition for the given word.<br>domestic system​
    7·2 answers
  • Christopher Columbus's four voyages across the Atlantic led to what?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP AM GIVING ALL MY POINTS
    9·1 answer
  • There are many amendments to the Constitution. How many are included in the Bill of Rights?
    14·1 answer
  • ______were necessary for the transport of raw materials and goods as
    13·2 answers
  • Which resource is a non-renewable and non-recyclable resource?
    9·2 answers
  • Which leader is most closely associated with the rise of fascism in Italy prior to World War II?
    12·2 answers
  • Which factor MOST determined the caste to which a person belonged in ancient india
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!