1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
3 years ago
6

1.Which best explains why most English citizens began migrating to North America in the 1600s? They were fleeing from a depressi

on that caused starvation. They sought to escape a religious war in their homeland. They wanted to create joint-stock companies in a new land. They desired the chance to buy their own farmland. 2.North American colonies became a place where English Puritans, Catholics, and Quakers sought to worship freely. convert American Indians. fund their churches. start new religions. 3.Which example best describes a French settlement in North America? a colony in the northeastern US that focused on the harvesting of timber a trading post in Quebec, Canada, that thrived on the trading of furs a trading post in Montreal, Canada, that specialized in the selling of gold a colony in the southeastern US that excelled at growing tobacco cash crops 4.Why did the English build Fort King George in 1721? as a key trading center for its valuable furs. to prevent Spanish and French attacks. as a key entrance to the Northwest Passage. to stop the spread of disease from the west. 5.Which best explains how the English and the French approached colonization of North America? England aimed to continue its worldwide network of colonies, while France wanted to stop Spain. England sought new opportunities for settlers, while France wanted to help American Indians. France sought a place for religious freedom, while England aimed to spread Christianity. France aimed to acquire goods to send home, while England wanted a source of raw materials. 6.French settlers had violent clashes with which American Indian tribe? Iroquois Algonquin Huron Wampanoag
History
1 answer:
Anarel [89]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

As the city of London filled to capacity in 1600, Richard Hakluyt suggested to Queen Elizabeth that settlements in the New World might relieve the city of some of its poorer folks.

Compared with other European nations in 1600, England was relatively poor.

As new agricultural techniques made fewer farmers necessary, the poor multiplied in the streets of cities such as London and Bristol. Much to the dismay of the wealthier classes, the impoverished were an increasingly burdensome presence and problem.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Pls help me if u can ;)
ivolga24 [154]

Answer:

sure ill help lel

Explanation

Each local chapter was expected to either build, purchase, or lease a Grange Hall and make it open to activities by members and nonmembers alike. Over the years, these halls have served as community centers in many small towns. During its earlier years the Grange was primarily an educational and social resource for farmers and rural communities, while other organizations, notably the Farmers Alliance, were more active in the political sphere. When the Grange decided to enter the fray, its presence was quickly felt, and perhaps nowhere more strongly than in the Northwest.

The first Grange in Washington Territory was Waitsburg Grange No. 1 in Walla Walla County, started in 1873 and still active as of 2014. The economic woes that followed the Panic of 1873 led to a rapid increase in local chapters, but when the crisis passed membership fell dramatically. By 1886 Washington Territory's 60 or so Granges had been reduced to as few as six before starting a slow rebound. Until statehood, Washington's territorial chapters operated under the umbrella of the Oregon State Grange.

In September 1889 a proposed state constitution, drafted that summer in Olympia at a convention heavily influenced by railroad interests, was awaiting ratification. On September 10, almost exactly two months before Washington became the 42nd state and just three weeks before the vote on the constitution, members of 16 territorial Grange chapters met at the Pioneer Store in La Camas (now Camas), Clark County, and with the help of organizers from Oregon and California an independent Washington State Grange came into being.

The new Grange immediately objected to the proposed constitution, publishing an eight-point manifesto that asked all "farmers, laboring men and taxpayers" to reject the document (Crawford, 15). In an early sign of a populist bent, the Grange argued, among other things, that too many public offices were being created, salaries were set too high, and the result would be "an office-seeking class, the most worthless class that can exist. It will also foster machine politics of the most corrupt and offensive character" ("Statehood 1889"). The Grange also published a list of questions it intended to ask of all candidates for the state legislature in that first election. These evidenced many of the political, social, and economic concerns that would be identified with the Progressive Movement, including increased government control of the railroads and other monopolies, tax reform, woman suffrage, preservation of public lands, and the prohibition of alcohol. But for the state constitution, the Grange's efforts came too late, and the document as drafted was approved by the then all-male electorate on October 1.

Reining in the Railroads

By 1892, the Washington Grange had grown to 36 subordinate chapters with 1,219 members. One year later, the railroad companies again dragged the nation's economy down, causing the Panic of 1893 and five years of economic stagnation. By the end of 1894, only 28 local Granges remained in Washington, and the only thing keeping many members in the organization was its cooperative fire-insurance association, started that same year. But that alone was not enough, and by 1898 there were only 20 subordinate chapters and fewer than 500 members. This was the low point; from there the state Grange would rebuild, first gradually, then rapidly. By 1909 membership had grown to 9,000; three years later it had nearly doubled, to 17,000.

Railroad corporations and farmers were natural enemies, and the former found many ways to enrich themselves at the expense of the latter. During their rapid expansion in the late nineteenth century railroad companies, with vague promises of huge profits and cheap shipping, persuaded individual farmers and rural towns to invest in railroad bonds. Many did, mortgaging property and equipment to do so, and many were bankrupted when the railroads overbuilt and overspent, then evaded their obligations through complex reorganizations and fraudulent bankruptcies.

When the rail lines were complete, the promise of cheap transportation evaporated. Large shippers were given preferential rates, and railroads recouped losses from highly competitive long-distance routes by overcharging for shorter runs. The proliferation of new farms in the West led to greater production and lower prices for agricultural goods. Middlemen muscled in to take a further cut from farmers' profits, and soon there were no profits. In Washington, the Grange worked hard for change, and in 1905 the first state Railroad Commission was created, empowered to investigate and adjust rates when complaints were received. The battles would go on for decades, but this was a victory for which the Grange could broken.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explains the impact of new weapon technologies in world war 1
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

Explanation:The new technologies led to trench warfare and the lack of new tactics led to massive slaughter at the hands of the new technology. The machine gun and the tank were new technologies that influenced WW1 the most. The machine gun lengthened the war and forced it to become a trench war.

8 0
3 years ago
Could the united states between 1870 and 1914 be considered a land of opportunity
Debora [2.8K]
Yes, America has always been the land of opportunity chance. 
Hope this helps :D
8 0
3 years ago
What was the outcomes of conflicts between native americans and the u.s military on the plains?
polet [3.4K]
The OUTCOME was the destruction of the native people who were forced out of their homes and the U.S took what ever they owned and kicked them out.
5 0
3 years ago
Help fast
Ugo [173]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which French explorer reach the most western point
    11·1 answer
  • The First Crusade:______.a. further strengthened Byzantine commerce and trade in the east. b. disrupted the trade routes between
    6·1 answer
  • What rights are protected under the First Amendment?
    11·2 answers
  • Under the system of sharecropping, contracts usually favored
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the Depression in the United States spread to other nations?
    11·1 answer
  • The youngest person ever elected President was _____. Richard Nixon Barack Obama John F. Kennedy William McKinley
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these had the MOST significant impact on the crash of the stock market in the United States in 1929?
    7·2 answers
  • What are four key issues Jefferson is faced with when considering the purchase of the Louisiana Territory?
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes Pres. John Adam's attitude toward going to war with France? * 1 point He was eager to go to war despite the
    10·1 answer
  • What is a responsibility of the U.S. Senate in foreign policy?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!