1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zielflug [23.3K]
3 years ago
9

Did the legislative or executive branch have more of an impact on reconstruction?

History
1 answer:
ValentinkaMS [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Legistlative

Explanation:

Apart from representing their constituents and making laws, legislators are educators. They are responsible for making new laws and changing existing laws. So they have more power on reconstruction because whatever they reached on is sent to the Executive to carry out just like it appears.

You might be interested in
The America South is an example of a __________ culture region.
attashe74 [19]
Formal should be the answer. It seems most appropriate.
8 0
2 years ago
what do u ppl do when not on your phone ? I cant find a hobby where I can do that lasts hours. I love baking but I can bake 24/7
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

Painting

Explanation:

You can draw or paint if you cant go out even if youre bad just try your best!

7 0
3 years ago
How does the presence of light affect photosynthesis?
Pani-rosa [81]
As the intensity of light increases, the rate of photosynthesis will increase as long as all other needed factors are involved
6 0
3 years ago
What would be the benefit of the free navigation of the Mississippi River?
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

Free navigation will help with more frequent trade

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is Zinn's approach to the study of history? What does he suggest occurs when history is told as a story of human progress?
alina1380 [7]

Zinn said that study of history should be done from the point of view of the common man. It should not be done from the point of view of the historians or the politicians.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Zinn thought that the way we study history is very boring and that we have been bent under the heavy weight of the history books which lean up on us. They have set from the point of view of the historians and the politicians. This makes it very boring for us to read this subject.

History should rather be studied from the point of view of the common man so that they can understand it better because through this way they can related to it in a better way. When it is told in the form of a story, the interest of the people increases.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which year did communist rule end in russia
    15·1 answer
  • Problems faced by labor unions included: lack of unity opposition from corporations labor laws the blacklisting of leaders oppos
    13·1 answer
  • On what date was florida admitted as a state to the union
    12·1 answer
  • What 2 theories developed during the industrial revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • How does the communist red guard quote reflect the political repression that mao political opponents face during the cultural re
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following resulted in Ashoka’s rule of the Mauryan Empire
    10·1 answer
  • Where did the Separatists take their families in 1608?
    6·2 answers
  • The largest group of African American professionals in Texas in the early 1900s was ministers and teachers. Select one: True or
    12·1 answer
  • Why did it take just six weeks for a keelboat to float down the Mississippi to New Orleans but four months to make the return tr
    6·2 answers
  • Explain why farmers especially in Western Pennsylvania were so upset with the Whiskey Tax.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!