1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mumz [18]
3 years ago
7

How did Alfons Heck first respond to evidence of concentration camps and death camps? Why do you think he responded this way?

History
1 answer:
zysi [14]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Alfons Heck first responded in awe to evidence of concentration camps and death camps. He was in shock when the allied forces showed him a documental with the atrocities of the Nazi Party in the concentration camps. He responded this way because when he was recruited by the Nazis, he and other young German people believed that they were fighting for their country and to defend its ideals against the enemies, but he never imagined the kind of horror and atrocities that Jewish people suffered in concentration camps, where the Nazis killed them in the gas chambers.

You might be interested in
Wilhelm I was declared kaiser of Germany in
sergejj [24]
It depends on how specific you want to be, but he was declared kaiser in 1871; more specifically, January 18th, 1871.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will mark Brainliest if correct!!
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

C. merge, which determines how well the character can remain camouflaged

Explanation:

If they are camoflaged, they will probably be unnoticed.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians arguments?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

One is fighting for the British colonies and the other is stating how Americas liberty and freedom is important

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

1. Australia, Korea, Japan

2. Canada, USA, Mexico

3. Russia, China

4. Argentina, Chile, Brazil

5. south; east

6. north; west

6 0
3 years ago
Mosaic law taught "an eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth," which seems an antiquated form of justice in the very
iVinArrow [24]

Over the years and with the constant evolution of society, it is normal for some of the rights of humanity to be reformulated and even replaced by better rights and more consistent with the well-being of society.

As seen above, the Mosaic Law "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", stipulated that an individual had to pay their crimes in the same currency. Thus, if a person killed someone, they should be punished with death. Currently, this concept is completely replaced by basic human rights that are defended by the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights", which states that everyone has the right to life and security, regardless of their crimes.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are 2 positives of andrew Carnegie and 2 negatives
    9·1 answer
  • Use the image to answer the question.
    6·1 answer
  • What important event occurred during the exodus of the Hebrews from Egypt?
    7·1 answer
  • The articles of confederation with the powers of the state and national government review the powers if it is a problem that cou
    9·1 answer
  • which person most likely has grounds for suing the government for violation of first amendment rights?
    12·1 answer
  • During the Constitutional Convention, the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise gave Congress the power to
    12·2 answers
  • What is scouts real name?
    6·1 answer
  • what were the different effects of african Americans, Mexicans Americans, and women's citizen mobilization during world war 1?​
    8·1 answer
  • Religious teacher who preached a new
    5·1 answer
  • Which country in the world do you think will use nuclear<br> weapons next?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!