when our individual fight for the good life requires someone else’s idea of the good life to be sacrificed, ultimately, it will causes another person's idea of the good life to be sacrificed.
<h3><u>
What is good life?</u></h3>
- Not everyone who appears to be living "the dream" or "the good life" actually is. Consider the notorious Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar as an example. Yes, he lived comfortably.
- Escobar, after all, is known to have been the richest criminal in history. He owned opulent homes, race vehicles, and private jets.
- And I have no doubt that he finds joy and fulfillment in his life. As you can see, there may be a significant distinction between leading a good life and leading the good life. Not everyone who is happy with their life is also happy with their life.
The phrase "the good life" describes a (desirable) condition that is largely characterized by a high standard of living or by abiding by moral and ethical principles.
Know more about good life with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/18909492
#SPJ4
The correct answer is poor time management symptoms.
Poor time management leads to a lot of downfalls. Individuals who don't have control over their chance ends up giving tasks a chance to wait until the last moment – and after that they feel a great deal of pressure when they attempt to try to catch up for lost time. In the event that you've given an excessive number of tasks a chance to sit, you may miss due dates altogether.
Observations : the road is not properly connected, there are 2 houses in the picture
Inference: this is a road not traveled often.
The quote means that you should treat others they way you want to be treated. You should not treat others by being mean. If you don't want to be hurt or bullied, then don't bully others. If you are nice to a person, they will be nice to you.
PS A word to describe the quote you asked is the Golden Rule.
Hope you can understand that clearly. :-)
Follow if you want.
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy, who was 1/8 African American, tried to ride in a "whites only" train car, violating a Louisiana law that separate amenities must be provided for people of different races. The Court found that separate accommodations were allowed by the "privileges and immunities" and "equal protection" clauses of the fourteenth amendment as long as they were comparable in quality.