Which graph best represents the feasibility region for the system shown below?
2 answers:
<h3>Answer: Correct option is 3rd option. </h3>
Step-by-step explanation: Given inequalities
x≥ 0
y≤ 8
y ≥ x and
y ≥ .
Let us graph the lines on the calculators first.
x≥ 0 : First inequality line would be a solid line and we would shade right side of y-axis because we have greater than or equal to symbol.
y≤ 8 : Second inequality line would be a solid line and we would shade down the line because we have less than or equal to symbol.
y ≥ x : Third inequality line would be a solid line and we would shade up of the line because we have greater than or equal to symbol.
y ≥ : Fourth inequality line would be a solid line and we would shade up of the line because we have greater than or equal to symbol.
From the graph we can see that middle portion is the common feasible region.
<h3>Therefore, correct option is 3rd option. </h3>You might be interested in
Answer:
So then we have that Morten Andersen scored on average 97.45 points per year in his career.
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the following table on the figure attached.
We see that the career points for Morten Andersen was 2437. That include all the points over alll the years the he played in the NFL.
Since the total years played by Morten Andersen was 25 we can write the following equation:
Where represent the rate of points average per year.
If we solve for r from the last equation we can divide both sides of the equation and we got:
So then we have that Morten Andersen scored on average 97.45 points per year in his career.
