Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
The vertex form for a quadratic equation has the following form:

Where the vertice of the equation is the point (h, k)
To transform the equation
in its vertex forms we must find its vertex.
Be a quadratic equation of the form:

Where a, b and c are real numbers, then the vertex of the equation will be:

For the given equation:

Therefore the vertice is:

Now we substitute x = 6 into the equation and find the value of k.

Therefore the vertice is: (6, -16)
And the equation is:

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
nth term = a +(n-1)d
a3 = 116 ; a + 2d = 116 ---------(i)
a7 = 180; a + 6d = 180 -------(ii)
multiply (ii) by -1. so a will be eliminated
a + 2d = 116 ---------(i)
(ii)*-1 <u>-a - 6d = -180</u> -------(ii) { Now add the two equations}
- 4d = -64
d = -64/-4
d = 16
Plug in the value of d in equation (i),
a + 2*16 = 116
a + 32 = 116
a = 116 - 32
a = 84
12th term = 84 + 11* 16 = 84 + 176 = 260
Answer:
Tristan will need 32 feet of material for the perimeter of the garden.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that
Area of square garden = A = 64 square feet
Perimeter = P = ?
We know that for calculation of perimeter, length of side of square is required which is not directly given in the question. The area will be used to calculate length of side and then length will be used to calculate the perimeter.
So,

s is for side
Putting the value of area

Taking square root on both sides

The length of side is 8 feet.
Perimeter will be:

Hence,
Tristan will need 32 feet of material for the perimeter of the garden.
Answer:
$128
Step-by-step explanation:
your looking for 16/8, divide 16 by 3, leaving you with 5.333...
now times that by $24, and you have your answer hope this helps
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Going by the first attached image below we reject H_o against H_1 if obs.
here obs.T=1.879

we accept
at 5% level of significance.
i.e there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the special study program is more effective at 5% level of significance.
1.
this problem is simillar to the previous one except the alternative hypothesis.
Let X_i's denote the bonuses given by female managers and Y_i's denote the bonuses given by male managers.
we assume that
independently
We want to test 
define 
now 
the hypothesis becomes

in the third attached image, we use the same test statistic as before
i.e at 5% level of significance there is not enough evidence to indicate a difference in average bonuses .