Answer:
286 students attended
148 non students attended
Step-by-step explanation:
Given




Solving (a): Number of students
Represent students with S and non students with N
So:
--- (1)
--- (2)
Make N the subject of formula in (1)

Substitute 434 - S for N in (2)

Open Bracket

Collect Like Terms


Divide through by -2

<em>Hence; 286 students attended</em>
Solving (b):
Recall that



<em>148 non students attended</em>
Answer:
x < 3 7/16
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The value is
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The probability of the device failing during the warranty period is 
The sample size is 
The random variable considered is x = 15
Generally this is distribution is binomial given the fact that there is only two out comes hence
X which is a variable representing a randomly selected selected electronic follows a binomial distribution i.e

Now the mean is mathematically evaluated as

=> 
=> 
The standard deviation is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Now given that n is very large, then it mean that we can successfully apply normal approximation on this binomial distribution
So
Now applying Continuity Correction we have

Generally 

From the z-table

Thus
The expected value of health care without insurance is $437.25.
The expected value of health care with insurance is $1,636.40.
<h3>What are the expected values?</h3>
The expected values can be determined by multiplying the respective probabilities by its associated costs.
The expected value of health care without insurance = (1 x 0) + (0.32 x 1050) + (0.45 x $225) = $437.25.
The expected value of health care with insurance = (1 x 1580) + (0.32 x 75) + (0.45 x $72) = $1,636.40.
To learn more about multiplication, please check: brainly.com/question/13814687
#SPJ1
Answer:
18 and 65
Step-by-step explanation:
under 18 would be 17 and under, therefore not including 18 year olds. obviously they are not 19 yet either, so they wouldn't fall into either category, therefore they may be unsure of what to answer.
same with 65 year olds; they are more than 64 year old, but not yet /over/ 65, therefore they would not fit into either category either.