Question

The Montana Supreme Court rules against Natural Grocery Mart in a case against One Stop 2 Shop Stores, Inc. Natural Grocery asks the United States Supreme Court to review the case. The Court does not hear the case. This:________.
a. is a decision on the merits that has value as a precedent.b. indicates agreement with the Montana court’s decision.c. means nothing.d. means that the Montana court’s decision is the law in Montana.

Answer 1

Answer: Means that the Montana court’s decision is the law in Montana.

Explanation: The courts decision not to hear the case shows that their earlier ruling on the case between Natural Grocery Mart and One Stop 2 Shop Stores, Inc., is a constitutional law that binds to everyone in the jurisdiction enacted by the government through the congress and the court has no power to reverse it.