Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
1) 18.4%
2) 27.20%
Explanation:
Solution
To get the Expected return for your fund we have to the percentage of Treasury bill and risk premium. That is,
T-bill rate + risk premium = 6.4% + 12% = 18.4%
Standard deviation of client's overall portfolio = 0.80 × 34% = 27.20%
Answer:
c. reserves increase by $100 million and the money supply increases by more than $100 million
Explanation:
Based on the information given in a situation where a FRACTIONAL-RESERVE BANKING SYSTEM has no availability of EXCESS RESERVES and no CURRENCY HOLDINGS, which means that if the central bank buys BONDS that worth $100 million, the RESERVES will tend to INCREASE by the amount of $100 million while the MONEY SUPPLY on the other hand will INCREASES by more than $100 million.
7%........................
Answer: y = 66x - 1200
Explanation: The charity organisation has to sell a number of tickets to cover their production costs of $1,200. It is given that after selling 200 tickets they retain a net profit of $12,000. Net profit is deduced as: Total sales - total costs. Sales is calculated as total tickets x selling price per ticket.
If we let b represent the sales earned from selling tickets, then:
Net profit = total sales - total costs
12,000 = 200b - 1,200
We can then solve for b by taking the 1200 to the other side of the equal sign. When we do that the sign of that number changes. This is also the same as adding 1200 to both sides of the equal sign:
∴12000 + 1200 = 200b
13200 = 200b
To get the price of one single ticket, b, we need to divide both sides by 200.
∴ b = 66
This means that each ticket's selling price is $66.
So when when we take it back to the calculation of net profit then it becomes:
Net profit = total sales - total costs
y = 66x - 1200
To test:
y = 66x - 1200
= 66 (200 tickets) - 1200
= $12,000
