Answer:
Company should continue with old machine (Alternative 1)
Explanation:
Preparation of a differential analysis dated April 11 on whether to continue with the old machine (Alternative 1) or replace the old machine (Alternative 2)
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Continue with old machine(Alternative 1) ; Replace with old machine(Alternative 2); Differential effect on income
REVENUES
Proceeds from sale of machine
$0 $50500 $50500
COSTS
Purchase price $0 -$75000 -$75000
Direct labor -$56000 -$37000 19000
(11200*5 = -56000)
(7400*5 = -37000)
Income (loss) -$56000 -$61500 -$5500
Based on the above differential analysis the Company should continue with OLD MACHINE (Alternative 1)
I believe this would be the expected product.
hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer is letter D.
Explanation:
The difference is statistically significant, large, and important.
Answer: a. It merely conducted some activity outside of Alaska and that activity took place through a website.
Explanation:
CalmDown can use the defence that all it did was to conduct an activity through it's website and this happened to be outside Alaska.
As such the company is still bound by the state that it is registered in which in this case would seem to be in Alaska. They are not to be bound by the laws of another jurisdiction from the one they are registered to if the activity was done on the internet.
Marcus should therefore try to bring action against them in Alaska if he can.
Answer:
Transaction price of the arrangement for Blair Biotech is $10,000,000.
2) Journal Entries for Blair.
Date Accounts Debit$ Credit$
12/20/2017 Accounts Receivable $10,000,000
License Revenue $10,000,000
01/15/2018 Cash $10,000,000
Accounts Receivable $10,000,000
Explanation:
