1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BARSIC [14]
3 years ago
11

Why was it difficult for Congress to fulfill its duties under the Articles of Confederation? Group of answer choices

History
1 answer:
nlexa [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It was difficult for Congress to fulfill its duties under the Articles of Confederation because Congress lacked the power to regulate foreign trade, and most congressional decisions required the approval of at least nine states.

Explanation:

According to the Articles of Confederation, the member states had their own foreign policy and armed forces. Member states also had the right to resign from the Confederacy. Each member state had one vote in the Unicameral Congress. The Congress elected a committee consisting of one representative from each member state to conduct the foreign and security policy. It elected a president from among its members for a year at a time. Congress had little power because it had no taxing power and could not make decisions binding on member states. In nominal terms, Congress had the power to conduct foreign, military and monetary policy, but it could not compel a member state to allocate funds. With the exception of foreign policy, the decisions of the central government were only recommendations which were not binding on the states and for which the central government had no powers, prerogatives or military powers. All major decisions also required the unanimity of the states.

You might be interested in
In President Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy faced a serious challenge
Neporo4naja [7]

Woodrow Wilson assumed the post of US President in 1912 with little experience in foreign affairs. He firmly resolved to build his foreign policy on moral principles, on selfish materialism, as his predecessors did. Moral diplomacy is a system in which support is given only to countries with the same moral principles. At the same time, this system should harm states whose principles are incompatible with moral principles, and such states are seen as enemies of America. Wilson hoped to increase the number of democratic countries, especially in Latin America. This attitude of Wilson on mild diplomacy and America's role in world politics comes from American exceptionalism, so he often intervened in the affairs of Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, Panama, the Dominican Republic. Because of this, he had international problems, especially in Mexico. This Latin American country has been known for its revolutions since 1910. The Americans, with their mining and other interests, demanded immediate intervention. When Victoriano Huerta assumed power in Mexico in 1913, Wilson refused to recognize him, although many world powers did so. Other countries supported Huerta because he was open to foreign investment. All this did not fit into Wilson's moral policy. In April 1914, following the capture of several American sailors by Huerta, Wilson used this to justify an order to the American Navy to take over the port city of Veracruz.

3 0
4 years ago
12. What are Grants in aid?
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

they are like block grants. they are money from the federal government that helps a specific program or project

Explanation:

really need brainliest!!

6 0
4 years ago
Why did Lowcountry planters resist giving the Upcountry equal representation in the Assembly?
34kurt
A. Lowcountry planters feared the Upcountry dod not support slavery.
3 0
3 years ago
__________ marked the transition from the end of the middle ages to the rise of nation-states. a. the treaty of tordesillas b. t
melamori03 [73]

The __________ marked the transition from the end of the middle ages to the rise of nation-states. Hence option C is correct the Peace of Westphalia

<h3>What can you say briefly about the Middle Ages?</h3>

The Middle Ages were a time in European history that stretched from the Renaissance era to the collapse of Roman civilization in the fifth century CE .

Economic growth, governmental centralization, and secularization all predicted the shift from the medieval to the modern era.

Thus the correct answer is option C

Learn  more about the middle ages :

brainly.com/question/26586178

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following was a consequence of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo?
White raven [17]

Answer:

The war between the United States and Mexico ended.

Explanation:

The war between the United States and Mexico ended was a consequence of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Where in georgia did spain settle ??
    13·1 answer
  • In early cultures, it was common to have larger families because _____. Select all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • The most urban country in the north africa middle east region is
    12·1 answer
  • Which Amendment to the Constitution abolished slavery?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the fredonian rebellion
    5·1 answer
  • Humanitarian organizations help by providing
    10·1 answer
  • How might a renaissance painter convey humanism
    9·2 answers
  • 1 si 2 va rogg mult e urgent
    15·1 answer
  • Why does control of the federal bureaucracy raise so many challenges?
    7·1 answer
  • Plato wrote that a tyrant can become dangerous because every tyrant has too much:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!