Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
Answer:
ok its different from one to one you can say your more friendly your family and your friends like your minde because you are clever thats a describe . I hope I answer your question
The author of your text states that the most age-segregated social institution in our society is a four-year college.
Even as changing demographics make this educational paradigm outmoded, universities are among the most age-segregated social institution, catering mostly to young people in their late teens and early 20s. Social Institutions are structured patterns of ideas and behavior that are oriented on fundamental social needs.
Social Institutions are interconnected systems of social roles and social norms that are established to fulfill a vital social need or social function. That was all altered by the Industrial Revolution. The young and the old could not work in factories because they were too risky; only people in their middle years did so. Pediatrics and gerontology are emerging fields in healthcare. People started to gradually separate by age.
To know more about Social Institutions refer to: brainly.com/question/9793095
#SPJ4
Question in English:
What are the consequences of giving a bad argument?
English Answer:
Well, really bad things don't happen. The only thing I can think of is that you just lose, but again it depends on who you are and how you feel about it.
Responde en español:
Bueno, las cosas realmente malas no pasan. Lo único que se me ocurre es que simplemente pierdes, pero de nuevo depende de quién eres y cómo te sientes al respecto.
Extra en español:
Lo siento si mi español es malo, no lo he hecho en un tiempo, je. :)
Extra in english:
Sorry if my Spanish is bad, I haven't done it in a while, heh. :)
Well this is quite easy I believe the smallest flock he can have is 1 because everytime he increased his counts there will always be 1 sheep left so its best for him to count by 1s instead hope this helps
