Answer:
The great compromise satisfied both small and large states in the United States by directing that every state should have equal representation in the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
When the United States Constituton was being framed in 1787, a point was reached where there was disagreement between small and large states on the issue of representation.
Delegates from larger states believed they should have more representation in both the Senate and the House of Representatives because they contribute more to the country's resources. The delegates from the smaller states disagreed and wanted equal representation.
The great compromise that was proposed and accepted was that, every state gets the same number of seats in the senate, but in the House of Representatives, seats would be assigned to each state in proportion to its population.
Answer: b) this is a private law issue regarding contract law
Explanation: Private law is the law and regulation that is present individuals and has no relation with the government. Contract law states about the law that contains the agreement rules and regulations for binding individual through it.
The situation mentioned in the question about Kate and Micheal states about the problem of private law that is related with contract law. In their situation the private law was made for selling the house of Kate to Micheal.But Kate is refusing to perform transaction process which is raising the issue in the contract law. As per the contract agreement Kate should sell the house to Micheal and by denying to do so , she is creating the issue.
Other options are incorrect because it does not consider government rules so it cannot be a public law.It cannot be substantive law as civil society's regulation and rules are not required in given situation
Criminal law is not related with the situation as crime activity is not involved and tort law is not defined as civil laws are not broken .Thus, the correct option is option(b).
Answer:
<h3>The correct answer would be the doctrine of federal preemption.</h3>
Explanation:
Clause II of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states that federal law is the "supreme law of the land." It implies that every judge of state and other courts must follow the federal laws of the Constitution.
This clause, often termed as Supremacy Clause, allow federal laws to preempt state laws, even when both the state and federal governments have concurrent authority over a particular subject.
The doctrine of federal preemption simply implies that higher court may arrogate the law of a lower court if the two authorities come into conflict.
The first one is the correct one
The artist aims to convey friendliness, cooperation, and trade.
Why is Venice such a big deal?
During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, the Republic of Venice was a significant financial and maritime power, a staging ground for the Crusades and the Battle of Lepanto, as well as a crucial hub for trade (particularly in silk, grain, and spice) and the arts from the 13th century to the end of the 17th century.
What unique connection did Venice and Egypt have?
VENICE — For many years, Venetians traded the majority of the eastern spices found on European tables through the markets of Egypt. They brought unique textiles, colors, glass, metalwork, and other exquisite Islamic products with them.
To know more about Venice
brainly.com/question/7296585
#SPJ4
