1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena L [17]
3 years ago
11

How can tourism be developed in karnali province? Make a list of some suggestions.​

Social Studies
1 answer:
Sidana [21]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

November 12: Out of 100 new tourist destinations selected by the government, Karnali Province alone consists of 21 destinations. The Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation recently announced the list of the destinations having tourism potential but requiring promotion. Though Karnali Province is geographically backward, it is rich in natural beauty. The province is considered to be religiously, historically, culturally and archeologically rich.      

Seven tourist destinations from five districts of Karnalai have been included in the list that needs to be promoted. Similarly, 14 destinations from 10 districts have been included in the new destinations that are to be developed.

Shey Phoksundo National Park of Dolpa, Sinja Sabhyata of Jumla, Rara lake of Mugu, Panchakoshi Jwala Area and Kakrebihar, Deutibajai and Madan Ashrit Park of Surkhet fall under the destinations to be established and promoted.      

Similarly, destinations like Kupinde lake of Salyan, Dudul Chaitya of Jumla, Limi Upatyaka of Humla, Rara- Shey Phoksundo Trail, Panchal fall of Kalikot, Khalanga Durbar of Jajarkot, Kotgadhi-Panchal-Belaspur-Mahabu Tourism Development Area of Dailekh, Jajura lake of Surkhet, Guptilal, Bhadale cave, Shiva cave, Gidde danda and Rukum’s Chitripatan have been selected as the new destinations that need to be developed. Majority of the 14 new destinations to be developed are less popular.

You might be interested in
What democratic principles were advanced
TEA [102]
1. Rights come from God, not government

This Founding Principle is actually embedded in our Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The Founders didn’t believe governments bestowed rights, nor were they an agent to protect rights—governments were the ones that abridged rights.

2. All political power emanates from the people

The Founders were strongly influenced by John Locke, who advocated government as a social contract. The term, will of the governed, encapsulates this concept, which means the people are boss. The power of the people is declared in the first three words of the Constitution, “We the people …” This principle is also the underlying basis for our Declaration of Independence, “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

This principle dictated that conventions of the people were the only authorizing force to ratify the Constitution. Neither Congress nor the state legislatures had the power.

Delegate William Paterson, author of the New Jersey Plan, wrote, “What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental law are established.”

3. Limited representative republic

The Founders believed in limited government in the form of a representative republic. They distrusted a direct democracy, because they equated it to mob rule. James Madison constantly preached against any system that allowed special interests (factions) to gain control of the government. He showed that throughout history, majority factions tyrannized minorities, whether the minorities be based on race, wealth, religion, or even geography.

The Founders believed that to protect against government oppression, they must disperse power, and give each branch of government formidable checks on the authority of every other branch. By the end of the Constitutional Convention, the Founders also came to firmly believe that the states must act as a solid check on the national government. Last, monarchies had general power, so they would give the national government only delineated powers.

4. Written Constitution

If government is a social contract, and it has only limited power formally delegated by the people, then the contract—Constitution—must be in writing. The strongest proponent of a written constitution was Thomas Paine, who said, “[A]n unwritten constitution is not a constitution at all.” This may seem commonplace today, but England, the most powerful nation on earth, had no written constitution. This was different in America, however, where all thirteen states had a written constitution. This American tradition goes back to the Mayflower Compact. Our national heritage is a written constitution that sets the rules for governance between the people and their elected representatives. The Founders intent was that this contract would only be changed through the amendment process.

5. Private Property Rights

The Founders were influenced by Adam Smith, and were firm believers in private property rights. In their minds, private property rights were intertwined with liberty. True liberty would never allow the government to come at any time and take a person’s property. That would be Divine Right, which they had fought eight bloody years to escape.

James Madison said, “As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.” He meant that even if a person owned nothing else, he still owned his rights, which were the most valuable property of all.

The Constitutional Convention delegates didn’t agree on everything. In fact, they possibly only agreed on these Founding Principles. After all, they did argue for four months about the design of the government.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is NOT a religion in India?
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Islam

Explanation:

all the Islamic people were shoved to Pakistan afte the British left India

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELPPPPP which type of star is typically larger in size and has a more violent end (high mass star or a low mass star?)​
Gelneren [198K]

Supernova Stars

usually has a high mass

3 0
3 years ago
Which argument is Bismarck making in this excerpt
vekshin1

Answer:

C)

Explanation: I have found the rest of your question.

We had to avoid wounding Austria too severely; we had to avoid leaving behind in her any unnecessary bitterness of feeling or desire for revenge; we ought rather to reserve the possibility of becoming friends again with our adversary of the moment, and in any case to regard the Austrian state as a piece on the European chessboard. If Austria were severely injured, she would become the ally of France and of every other opponent of ours; she would even sacrifice her anti-Russian interests for the sake of revenge on Prussia. . . . The acquisition of provinces like Austria Silesia and portions of Bohemia could not strengthen the Prussian state; it would not lead to an amalgamation of German Austria with Prussia, and Vienna could not be governed from Berlin as a mere dependency. . . . Austria's conflict and rivalry with us was no more culpable than ours with her; our task was the establishment or foundation of German national unity under the leadership of the King of Prussia.

Which argument is Otto von Bismarck making in this excerpt?

A. He is insisting that German unification should be the force that unites all German speakers in Europe.

B. He is offering to defend German Austria from Bohemian nationalism in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

C. He is rejecting the idea that German Austria should be made a part of a future united Germany.

D. He is warning the Prussian king not to go to war with Austria over Russian territory.

  • The answer is C because his argument at the beginning is saying that they should avoid wounding Austria too harsh because if Austria were injured then she will become the ally of France and his rival and that they will tend to revenge and conflicts of the Prussian state and that will not lead to an amalgamation.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Carly is in foster care. Carly’s school teacher blames her home environment and abuse for the problems she is having in school.
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Her past maybe. As she is a foster child, that's probably makes it harder for her to focus and do well in school

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which society is currently in a transition phase from agrarian to industrial?
    5·2 answers
  • Why do you think local governments grew in the colonies? How did they affect colonists’ beliefs?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the 12th Amendment
    12·1 answer
  • When the owner of a $250,000 life insurance policy died, the beneficiary decided to leave the proceeds of the policy with the in
    14·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP
    9·2 answers
  • If psychologists discovered that wealthy people are less satisfied with their marriages than poor people are, this would indicat
    6·1 answer
  • How does environment education help to<br>ate healthy environment?​
    9·1 answer
  • Successful.
    12·1 answer
  • What is the answer to this someone help me pls​
    7·1 answer
  • rosa, an avoid tennis player, is beginning to feel some slight aches in her elbows and knees, something she has never experience
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!