Answer:
The equation in vertex form is:

Step-by-step explanation:
Recall that the formula of a parabola with vertex at
is given by the equation in vertex form:

where the parameter
can be specified by an extra information on any other point apart from the vertex, that parabola goes through.
In our case, since the vertex must be the point (2, 1), the vertex form of the parabola becomes:

we have the information on the extra point (0, 5) where the parabola crosses the y-axis. Then, we use it to find the missing parameter
:

The, the final form of the parabola's equation in vertex form is:

Answer:
<h3>
Jake is 13 years old</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
D - age of Dani
J = D+2 - age of Jake
E = 2J = 2(D+2) = 2D+4 - age od Ethan
Z = 2E = 2(2D+4) = 4D+8 - age of Zoe
The sum of their ages is 102:
D + J + E + Z = 102
D + D+2 + 2D+4 + 4D+8 = 102
8D + 14 = 102
-14 -14
8D = 88
÷8 ÷8
D = 11
J = 11+2 = 13
Answer: Sensitivity Analysis. The notion of duality is one of the most important concepts in linear programming. Basically, associated with each linear programming problem (we may call it the primal. problem), defined by the constraint matrix A, the right-hand-side vector b, and the cost.
Step-by-step explanation:
This answer depends a bit on your age, the types of activities you partake in and the kind of work you do/are planning to do but here goes:
I am thinking of some uses of fractions where decimals are not typically used. One might be cooking. Often the ingredients (1/2 cup of four and so on) are measured using fractions. If you were in a world with decimals you might need to make (1/3) the servings of a recipe that calls for 1/4 of a cup of some ingredient and instead of 1/12 have to deal with a long repeating decimal that probably would need to be approximated so would not be precise.
While on the subject of food ordering pizza (1/2 with pepperoni, 1/4 mushrooms and 1/4 plain) would be doable after you got used to it but probably not as comfortable. Dividing up slices of pizza among friends (one slice is usually 1/8 of a pie) might be awkward though eventually doable.
Estimation - the biggest issue is exactitude versus estimation. When we use a fraction like 1/3 that is an exact value, but when we use .333 or .3333333 no matter how many 3s we use we are only estimating because the 3s go on forever and we can't write them forever. Yes, we can use .3 (with a bar over the 3, but now try to multiply that with .456565656 with a bar over the 56. This becomes practically impossible unless we estimate ... so the biggest issue would be that you would lose precision in many calculations and measurements and have to deal with answers that are good enough (but not exact).
Now say you work on some major car company or you design bridges or you are a scientist developing medicine that cures diseases, would not you want the ability to measure and compute precisely? If I split the pizza up wrong it is not a big deal. If I use a little more flour or a little less than I should in the recipe it might not make much of a difference in the end but if I am doing something that impacts the health, safety or well being of another human being, I would not want to live in a world where I have to estimate and can't count on having the exact, precise value.
Answer:
D) What is the number of gallons of water in a pool?
Step-by-step explanation:
A statistical question consists of varied responses and not just 1 specific answer. For example, the first 3 questions only have 1 specific answer each, while the last question can vary depending on the size of the pool.