27.32 you divide 24.50 and 11.5. Then add what you get from that to 24.50
Answer:
True because when you multiply the 2 by everything in the parentheses you get 4x + 6y which is 4x + 6y = 4x + 6y. and when you solve it you'll get 0 = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is faulty. It works once it gets to + 1, +2, +3
The other x values should be 0 and - 1 instead of -1 and -3.
Here's the formula I get.
f(x) = 2*3^(2x + 1)
f(0) = 2*3^(1)
f(0)= 6
f(-1) = 2*3^(-2 + 1)
f(-1) = 2*3^(-1)
f(-1) = 2/3
f(-2) = 2*3^(-2*2 + 1)
f(-2) = 2*3^(-4 +1)
f(-2) = 2*3^(-3)
f(-2) = 2/27
Since my answers do not agree with the given answers, I can do nothing more to help you. I will pass this along to someone I know who will see through it.
Answer:
c) there is an efficient algorithm to test whether an integer is prime
Step-by-step explanation:
The basis of modern cryptography is the fact that factoring large numbers is computationally difficult. No algorithm is efficient for that purpose.
<h3>Choices</h3><h3>a)</h3>
False - there is no known efficient algorithm for factoring large numbers
<h3>b)</h3>
False - there are 78,498 prime numbers less than 1,000,000. That is about 8% of them--far from being "most of the integers."
<h3>c) </h3>
True - a variety of algorithms exist for testing primality. In 2002, a test was published that runs in time roughly proportional to the 7.5 power of the logarithm of the number being tested.
<h3>d)</h3>
False - there is no known efficient algorithm for factoring large numbers
