Answer:
41.49 approx 42 months
Explanation:
To calculate the number of months, we use the formula for loan
p = r(pv) / 1 - (1+r)-n
make n subject of the formula
p ( 1 - ( 1+r) ^-n) = r(pv)
p - p (1+r)^-n = r(pv)
p (1+r)^-n = p-r(pv)
(1+r)^-n = (p-r(pv)) / p
( 1+r)^n = p / (p-r(pv))
n In( 1+r) = In (p / (p-r(pv))
n = In ( p/ ( p - r(pv)) / In ( 1 +r)
n is the number of months, p is the payment per months
pv is the present value of 5000
substitute the values given into the equation
n = (In ( 150 / (150 - ( 0.129 / 12 × 5000)) / ( In ( 1 + ( 0.129 / 12) = 41.49 approx 42 months
Answer:
$20 will be recorded as the 2018 expenditure.
Explanation:
In this case, $500 is the remaining in the General Fund for 2017 fiscal year in encumbrances that remained opened into fiscal year 2018.
In 2018, since encumbered goods were received at an invoiced cost of $520, $20 will be recorded as the 2018 expenditure after deducting the carry-forward of 2017 encumbered fund balances of 2017.
First balances carry-forwarded are utilized and then the funds allocated to the General fund for the current fiscal i.e 2018 is utilized. Hence the actual amount that would be recorded as the 2018 expenditure will be $520 - $500 carry forward from 2017 = $20.
Answer:
That are unforeseen or unpredictable circumstances
Explanation:
Mike and Natalie enter into a contract for a sale of ninety specially made motion detectors. When Natalie does not deliver within a reasonable time after the agreed delivery date, Mike files a suit for breach. Natalie claims the doctrine of commercial impracticability. This doctrine extends only to problems that are ___That are unforeseen or unpredictable circumstances example time______.
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
A bundle of resources has three characteristics: valuable (<em>the resource helps the company to pursue its objectives and is priceless for consumers</em>), rare (<em>limited competition</em>), and inimitable (<em>resource is not easy to reproduce by the firm's closest competitors or imitating it is expensive</em>).
Being<em> imitable </em>is the opposite of what a bundle of resources should be.
Answer:
A. Year 1 8.3%
Year 2 9.2%
B. Yes
Explanation:
(1) Calculation for its cash flow on total assets ratio for both years
Using this formula
Cash flow on total assets ratio =Net operating cash flow/Average total assets
Let plug in the formula
Year 1 Cash flow on total assets ratio=$102,920/$1,240,000
Year 1 Cash flow on total assets ratio=8.3%
Year 2 Cash flow on total assets ratio= 138,920/1,510,000
Year 2 Cash flow on total assets ratio= 9.2%
(2) Based on the above calculation YES it's cash flow on total assets improve in Year 2 versus Year 1
