The answer is B
Early humans were not farmers they lived off what the land provided as well as the animal did too.
There are still human today that are nomadic
Hope this helps
Depending on how Jim's relationship with his ex-wife ended, through bitterness or a mutual agreement to be friends, he could either be happy or sad. If he was in between, he probably would've felt uncomfortable, because he neither cared enough to find out before his son but wasn't as cruel to say he didn't care.
Resource mobilization theory is a theory where resources are needed for a social movement to bring about change, regardless of the group's level of deprivation.
<h3>What is the resource mobilization theory?</h3>
The resource mobilization theory is a well-known model employed to understand social movements and their schools of thinking.
- This theory (resource mobilization theory) states that the success of social movements largely depends on the availability of limited resources.
In conclusion, resource mobilization theory is a theory where resources are needed for a social movement to bring about change, regardless of the group's level of deprivation.
Learn more about resource mobilization theory here:
brainly.com/question/10208627
#SPJ4
Answer:isa. an unconditioned stimulus.
Explanation:
According to classical conditioning , the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is the one in which our response occurs naturally , automatic and unconditionally which means we don't learn how to respond.
For example a smell of your favourite pizza will immediately make you feel hungry because it actual triggers this automatic response from you. The smell of food is the unconditioned stimulus.
In Ivan Pavlov's classic experiment with dogs, when the dog smell their food , the salivating that result from them is an unconditioned response and food is the unconditioned stimulus, it an unlearned response that takes place naturally. This is the same as the meat powder above , which is the dog food.
The answer in the first sentence above is hypothesis because it is defined as having to state a prediction or conjecture in regards about an experiment whereas the second sentence' answer is experimental question because researchers tend to state what they plan to do in regards of their investigation and they do not apply any predictions in the experiment.