Answer and Explanation:
Hello. You did not provide the text to which the question refers, which prevents the examples and textual evidence from being accurate.
Although the three people mentioned in the question above fought for civil rights and an end to racism and discrimination against blacks, they had different opinions on how this fight should be carried out.
Rosa Parks was in favor of civil disobedience and the refusal of blacks to submit to what whites imposed on them. However, Rosa did not engage in violent movements, nor did she blame them, for her the purpose justified the means, provided that the rights of blacks were taken care of.
Martin Luther King advocated a peaceful struggle, without violent methods and cherishing the safety and peace of all involved. He believed that freedom and rights are not fought for by provoking violence, as it destroys everything good that can happen.
Malcolm X, on the other hand, defended an armed struggle, where civil rights would be enforced in the country, through not only civil disobedience, but violence for those who tried to prevent blacks from gaining their rights.
1. I dont know
2. Introduction and Conclusion
3. Deductive reasoning<span> is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true.
4. I dont know
5.C.
6. A.
7. </span><span>A </span>logical fallacy<span> is an error in reasoning that renders an argument invalid.
Mark brainliest</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Fellow works.
Knowledgeable also works.
Valued is possible.
In this sentence the proper noun is B California.
