Answer:
B.) Reduced.
Explanation:
The Reagan administration is sometimes thought to have reversed the growth of the welfare state by eliminating or shrinking welfare programs at all levels of government and by removing new re-distributional initiatives from the national agenda. This assault on the welfare state was motivated at least in part by philosophical considerations. Leaving aside questions of cost and efficacy, the new administration aimed to confine welfare payments to the “deserving poor” (the aged, children, the permanently disabled, and others who could not be expected to enter the work force) in order to reduce the distorting effects of welfare both in labor markets and on the moral character of recipients. In practice, the administration sought to reduce payments to those with relatively high incomes by tightening eligibility standards and by reducing benefit levels on various programs (Palmer and Sawhill 1982).
Answer:
there choice
Explanation:
what is your problem do your work
Answer: A large amount of energy is lost at each level, so there has to be a limit on the number of trophic levels.
Explanation:
Answer:
If each suspected drug dealer follows a dominant strategy, he/she should -<em> a. confess regardless of the partner's decision</em>
Explanation:
In game theory, one player would be displaying<u> strategic dominance</u> <u>if he or she chooses a </u><u>dominant strategy</u><u>, which promises a better outcome for this player regardless of the strategy chosen by the player he or she is playing against.</u>
Here, each suspected drug dealer will have a better outcome if he/she confesses and testifies against his/her partner, because in result he/she gets the best possible outcome - immunity.
The response is determined by quite a few factors such as
the party of the key senator, the temperament of the Senate, the explanations
against the appointment, the superiority of the nominee and the relation of the
President with the Senate.
