The growth of nationalism during the 19th and early 20th century had several consequences, but the most relevant were: the inevitable collision between nationalist states that wanted to have control on territory and population that speak the same national language (like the Franco-Prussian war in 1871); the collapse of big European multinational states (like the Austro-Hungarian Empire after WWI); and the rise of extremist nationalist ideologies that took control of many powerful European states.
Under these circumstances, the way in which powerful European states responded to the growth of nationalism can be divided into two fronts, first, there were some relevant states that embraced extremist nationalist ideologies and eventually were ruled by its premises and an offensive foreign policy towards its neighbors, like Fascism in Italy and Nazism in Germany. And second, other powerful states, like the UK and France, did not align with extremist nationalism but rather remained under a liberal and democratic form of government and a more defensive position. In general terms, World War II was the final clash between these two ideologies.
One of the reasons why foreign nations felt the united states would collapse when Jefferson beat Adams in the presidential election of 1800 is that "<span>C. they believed the inexperienced Jefferson would not be able to meet the challenges of a presidency", since Jefferson was openly in favor of a very limited executive branch. </span>
<span>The relationship between American colonial radicals and contemporary political radicals in Great Britain was related to the Puritan revolution. The writings of both Trenchard and Gordon chastised the British government for corruption and taxation for armies that were not defending the soil of Great Britain, but more to attack their colonies. Their writings also blamed the government for government patronage.</span>
Answer:
McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason, especially when related to communism, without proper regard for evidence.
Explanation:
D. Interpret and explain
Their role is a big part in the balancing of powers within the whole government system. Their job is to interpret the constitution and whether something is following the constitution in those cases. They also then hold court for many cars to decide this. They then decide and explain why this is following or breaking the constitution.