Answer:
This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.
Explanation:
I agree.
What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.
There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.
Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.
That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "
Answer: An engineering class, a history class, and a school reading program.
Explanation: These all are educational based in classrooms.
The perspective of social structuralism assumes that poverty is a result of economic or social imbalances. Therefore your answer would be B. Social Structuralism.
Answer:
It is against the First Amendment rights.
Explanation:
It is because according to the first amendment, it states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This means that there should not be any laws that should interfer one's freedom of expression, which is through religion practices, speeches, press (such as conventions, public meetings, etc), and publications (such as news, and other media platforms, and other ways of which we express ourselves through society. The reason why it is still allowed, because there are not additional laws in place that help protect the first admenment adenquately.
Answer:
The fifteenth amendment is the correct answer >apex<
<h2>
Please mark me as brainlyist i need it</h2>
