1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zlopas [31]
1 year ago
14

d. Do a research and briefly discuss the following processes that the community must engage in, whenever there is an issue befor

e and during a protest (for each bulleting below, write a paragraph): how to engage in a protest, protest restrictions, permit to hold a protest, activities during a protest, the powers of the police during a protest. . . . . (5x4=20)​
Law
1 answer:
gulaghasi [49]1 year ago
5 0

Answer:d

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Other than the title of why there are issues with minorities mistrust of the police. what other kinds of details is needed to do
pshichka [43]
I am a minority myself, so I hope this helps!

Distrust in the police is from generational trauma from oppression, take the stonewall riots for example. The LGBTQ+ community was fighting for the basic right to live, and the price of that meant that a lot of them, especially Trans Women of Color, were brutalized by the police, for peacefully protesting.
8 0
2 years ago
36010 feel free to answer​
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

1325

Explanation:

there u go mate

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The lack of a duty of pre- contractual good faith means that the law can now be summarised as: ‘[…] [T]here is no obligation in
Ugo [173]
Whdbdkckdns died thx did fake toe rot sit w
6 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper arti
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

3 0
2 years ago
What are discussions on legal principles of law?
inessss [21]

Answer:Most people tend unreflectively to assume that laws belong to legal

systems. "Most educated people," writes H. L. A. Hart, "have the

idea that the laws in England form some sort of system, and that in

France or the United States or Soviet Russia and, indeed, in almost

every part of the world which is thought of as a separate 'country'

there are legal systems which are broadly similar in structure in spite

of important differences."' This includes for most people the assumption that laws differ from non-legal rules and principles. There are,

for example, moral rules and principles, social customs, constitutions

and regulations of voluntary associations, and so on, which are not

laws. Many legal philosophers have tried to justify this common assumption. Various criteria have been offered for demarcating the

limits of law, for testing whether or not a particular standard belongs

to a particular legal system. Various suggestions have been made concerning the importance of the distinction between what is legal and

what is not, and the ways in which, by preserving it, we promote our

understanding of law and society. For it has often been acknowledged

that the distinction is not an easy one to draw in precise terms, and

that any reasonable test would admit the presence of borderline cases.

Despite these difficulties many theorists have thought that the distinction is worth preserving, partly because it is not difficult to apply in

the majority of cases and partly because it seemed to them crucial for

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Difinição Violencia domestica?
    9·1 answer
  • Why does the Senate have treaty and nomination approval?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the only treatment item that is on both sides of the DD Form 1380 (TCCC) card?
    10·1 answer
  • When the united states’ use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, it means to say that the governmen
    15·1 answer
  • What type of journalism answers the who, what, when, where, and why of important issues.
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following must be a feature of an activity for it to be a game
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of what a personal dentist could do in a civil case?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following are civil service employees of the federal government? (Select all that apply.)
    6·2 answers
  • Gawain sa pagkatuto bilang 2 punan ng angkop na kasagutan ang talahanayan sa ibaba​
    8·1 answer
  • ***ECONOMICS***
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!