Did the geography of Mesopotamia make it an easy or difficult place to
live? Explain.
Mesopotamia was not an easy place to live.
When addressing this question, there are two things that every history teacher is happy to see. The sinking of the Lusitania by the Germans was a spark along with the Zimmerman Telegraph by the Germans in an attempt to spark issues between Mexico an de the United States, this is when the United States joined the war. The most important moralist of all was President Woodrow Wilson—the man who dominated decision making so totally that the war has been labelled, from an American perspective, "Wilson's War". In 1917 Wilson won the support of most of the moralists by proclaiming "a war to make the world safe for democracy.
I hope this helps, God bless, and have a great day!
Brainliest is always appreciated :)
Answer:
Okay so basically
one way is that Mussolini craved for power and Hitler wanted to cleansed a race.
another way is that Mussolini came from a decent family. His father was aspiring and his mother had a stable job with a good pay. Mussolini wanted to show off his talent.
Hitler on the other hand was tortured by his father. Hitler only came to the office because of struggle and desperation.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Answer:
in Chinese history, the traffic that developed in the 18th and 19th centuries in which Western countries, mostly Great Britain, exported opium grown in India and sold it to China. The British used the profits from the sale of opium to purchase such Chinese luxury goods as porcelain, silk, and tea, which were in great demand in the West.
Explanation:
