1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Liula [17]
3 years ago
12

Based on the passage, in addition to land, what other benefits could native americans receive from the dawes act? u.s. citizensh

ip the right to vote protection from warring tribes immunity from prosecution in court
History
2 answers:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
5 0
Even though there is no passage, the correct answer is US citizenship.

With the Dawes Act, it was the hope of the federal government that they would be able to assimilate these Native Americans into "normal" American society. The promise of land and citizenship were the first parts of changing Native American culture. With citizenship rights, these Native Americans would be entitled to the same liberties/responsibilities as other citizens including the right to vote, right to free speech, right to protest, etc.
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
4 0

And every Indian born within the territorial limits of the United States to whom allotments shall have been made under the provisions of this act, or under any law or treaty, and every Indian born within the territorial limits of the United States who has voluntarily taken up, within said limits, his residence separate and apart from any tribe of Indians therein, and has adopted the habits of civilized life, is hereby declared to be a citizen of the United States, and is entitled to all the rights, privileges, and immunities of such citizens, whether said Indian has been or not, by birth or otherwise, a member of any tribe of Indians within the territorial limits of the United States without in any manner affecting the right of any such Indian to tribal or other property

THIS is the passage^^^^^^^^

You might be interested in
What were the types of resistance the German faced drom the jews? CHECK ALL THAT APPLY
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

What are the options we can't help without them

7 0
4 years ago
How Was the stamp act different from the sugar act
Kipish [7]
The sugar act was passed in 1764 and the stamp act was passed later in the year 1765.they were both designed to raise revenue for the British. But the reaction by the colonists to the acts was very different.
6 0
3 years ago
Who had the best land military in world war 1??
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

Germans

••••••••••••••

4 0
3 years ago
How did the proclamation of 1763 lead to the american revolution?
GrogVix [38]

On October 7, 1763, King George III issued a proclamation that forbade colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. In so doing, he hoped to placate Native Americans who had sided against him during the recently concluded Seven Years’ War. Enforcement was so weak, however, that it did very little to curb the westward flow of pioneers. Even prominent figures such as George Washington paid it no heed, except as a source of anti-British sentiment leading up to the American Revolution.

Great Britain’s victory over France in the Seven Years’ War, also known as the French and Indian War, gave it control over all of eastern North America. Most native tribes had allied with the French during the conflict, and they soon found themselves dissatisfied by British rule. In May 1763, just a few months after the formal conclusion of the Seven Years’ War, a pan-tribal confederacy led by Ottawa chief Pontiac rose up in rebellion. His warriors attacked a dozen British forts, capturing eight of them, and raided numerous frontier settlements. Hundreds died in the process. In response, the British handed out smallpox-infected blankets to Pontiac’s followers. Moreover, a gang of whites known as the Paxton Boys massacred 20 defenseless Native Americans who had nothing to do with the fighting.

In an attempt to prevent similar incidents from occurring, King George III issued a royal proclamation on October 7, 1763, which established three new mainland colonies (Quebec, West Florida and East Florida), extended Georgia’s southern border and gave land to soldiers who had fought in the Seven Years’ War. More notably, it banned colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains, at least “for the present, and until our further pleasure be known.” Those colonists already there were ordered to relocate. Acknowledging that “great frauds and abuses have been committed,” the proclamation furthermore prohibited individuals from buying tribal territory. Instead, only the crown could now make such purchases. “We shall avoid many future quarrels with the savages by this salutary measure,” said General Thomas Gage, who commanded all British forces in North America.

The British made a perfunctory effort to enforce the proclamation, periodically stopping settlers as they headed west and forcibly removing others. On one occasion, redcoats from Fort Pitt in present-day Pittsburgh even burned the huts of some nearby pioneers and escorted them back across the boundary. For the most part, though, colonists disregarded the proclamation without fear of punishment. Some wanted only enough land for themselves and their families, whereas others were speculators looking to make a hefty profit down the road. George Washington, for one, wrote to his agent in 1767 in support of illegally buying as much Native American land as possible. The Proclamation of 1763 will soon be revoked, Washington explained, because—“this I say between ourselves”—it was only meant “as a temporary expedient to quiet the minds of the Indians.” Other famous speculators included Patrick Henry, best known for his “Give me liberty or give me death” speech, and Henry Laurens, who later served as president of the Continental Congress.

Washington’s prediction proved prescient the following year, when the British 

5 0
3 years ago
What describes an effect of prohibition
vladimir2022 [97]
<span>The increase of the illegal production and sale of liquor (known as “bootlegging”), the proliferation of speakeasies (illegal drinking spots) and the accompanying rise in gang violence and other crimes was an effect of prohibition</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many amendments were added to the constitution in the twentieth century?
    7·1 answer
  • It is not uncommon for an executive agreement to be made
    5·1 answer
  • What prophet was sent by god to nineveh to preach repentance
    6·1 answer
  • In this lesson, you learned about the political changes in many Latin American nations since 1945. In the following chart, summa
    13·1 answer
  • Why were the puritans unhappy with the church of England?
    13·1 answer
  • The stalemate in the western front began after Germany failed to quickly defeaf
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Constitution requires the president be a natural -born citizen?
    13·2 answers
  • Türklere ait ikinci alfabe 18 harften oluşan______alfabesidir
    8·1 answer
  • In wat ways did the end of the old order move the revolution toward a more radical phase?
    6·1 answer
  • Koalas sleep about 22 hours a day . Pandas sleep about 10 hours a day. Aboy how many hours does a typical koala sleep in a year?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!