This passage points to the beginning of collectivization and the idea that everyone must share wealth.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The passage shows how everyone realized that the earth had many resources and these resources could make everyone live well.
- With that, the animals agreed that everyone should work hard, to explore these resources and share them with everyone.
- This kind of feeling was seen during the beginning of collectivization in Russia.
- This collectivization affirmed that everyone should work hard and share the wealth among themselves, promoting social equality and harmony.
With this, we can see that the narrative of "Animal Farm" presents elements of real-life and the history of countries for readers.
More information about "Animal Farm" at the link:
brainly.com/question/6848226
Answer:
It is not true because, if you fully accept it you would protest with it but, if you dont fully accept it then you really dont accept the evil but you put up a front to make it seem like you do.
Explanation:
Answer:
please give me brainlist and follow
Explanation:
We each have a unique personality. That's what makes us the same. But another way of saying We each have a unique personality is We are all different. So if we substitute one expression for the other, we have the apparent paradox that everyone is "different", and everyone is the "same".
A. Students who read in silence scored better than those who read with background noise.
Answer:
O Machiavelli uses logical evidence through historical examples to support his claim.
Explanation:
Niccolo Machiavelli's "The Prince" is a treatise that contains how princely states must be ruled and made to be obedient. It also details how rulers must act and do things in such a way to maintain power and authority over the state for a longer duration.
In the given passage/ excerpt, Machiavelli used historical evidence/ example to authenticate his argument that suggests that rulers of any state can be cruel if they are to rule over it for a long time. This is not only to maintain power over the state, but it is also needed for the security of the state and himself. Taking an example from <em>"Agathocles, the Sicilian King of Syracuse"</em>, Machiavelli mentions how the king <em>"assembled the people and the senate of Syracuse as if he had to discuss with them things relating to the Republic, and at a given signal the soldiers killed all the senators and the richest of the people"</em> and seize the power for himself without the need to directly hurt the common people.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
