Answer:
C. There is a sense of helplessness in dealing with the surrounding violence.
Explanation:
A. does not work because the author has made it clear that regardless of the precautions taken, abductions still occur.
B. The violence in Iraq is not being compared to that of neighboring countries. It is just Iraq's violence that is being focused on in the passage.
C. As with A, the author has made it clear that you can become abducted without a driver, with a driver, without bodyguards, and with bodyguards, so there is not much you can do but hope you are left alone, which is a feeling of helplessness. It can happen no matter what you do.
D. This is incorrect because it said in the passage that even with bodyguards you can be abducted.
Government grants reinforce negative values of laziness and entitlement.write an argumentative essay in which you argue for or against this issues I think I am not sure
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The narrator tells the story using I, I'm, I'll, because they are talking over themself, so it wouldn't be D.
It's also in <u>first person</u> so that means other characters wouldn't be able to narrate, that marks C out.
And, 1st and 3rd person perspectives are from a character's perspective in the book. So that means a first person narrator would have to be a character you hear narrating using words like I, I'm, etc. Meaning that you wouldn't be narrating, as it would be 2nd person (you, you'd, you'll). So it's not B.
Not sure what the question is but if it is how does the officers statement portray irony it is the fact that they are eating the murder weapon and demolishing the evidence.
