Answer:
The professor Bonefinder has made a mistake.
Explanation:
I't is true the Hominoid had a long snout, a large orbits that are partially enclosed, but they have no tail. This point is really critical because the morphology of an species is really important. The taxonomists use the information that morphology gave for many years to identify species, nowadays with molecular techniques some of those species are pulled apart, but the important matter is that hominoids had no tail.
So the professor Bonefinder analysis is incorrect because the hominoids have no tail.
The answer is bb (the only possible option because all the others suggest the woman’s eyes are brown)
Answer:
A). The model does not predict energy flow.
Explanation:
As per the given details, the most probable constraint of using 'numerical computer-built models' would be their 'inability to forecast the energy that is flowing throughout the ecosystem.' However, they assist in offering collected information at the same time yet <u>its failure to predict the actual amount of energy flowing that will lead to a failure to predict if the ecological balance is being maintained or not</u>. As a result, some organisms may be deprived of the appropriate food to ensure their survival and their existence on this planet might be under threat. Thus, this is the limitation of using such-technology based models and hence, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
If an A (Adenine) were swapped for a T (Thymine) it will lead to A TRANSVERSION TYPE OF POINT MUTATION.
Replacement of an A with a T is a transversion type of point mutation because in transversion the purine is replaced with a pyrimidine. Since in this case only one nucleotide is replaced, it is a point mutation.
Artificial Selection? I'm just guessing