The statement that the Contemporary view of change takes into consideration the environment is a True statement.
The contemporary view of change is different from the Traditional view of change. The traditional view is based on the facts that were given in the old times and the facts remain static in nature as they are not changed. The traditional perspective always looks at the static movements of change. On the other hand the contemporary view believes that even the environment is both static and dynamic in nature. From the beginning of the life, the environment has shown significant changes in itself. Trees, animals, rivers, lakes all have emerged and changed during the state of time. Also this change is uncertain as there is no fixed time for this change.
Learn more about Contemporary view at:
brainly.com/question/28545978
#SPJ4
Justin Beiber was born on 1 March 1994
Imperialism is the intention of one country to rule over another country: for example Great Britain wanted to gain control over India - this is an example of imperialism.
For this land is definitely needed : without a land, there is no "other" land to take over.
I would say that the other necessary aspect is people: the ruling country will need some local population to rule the country, if not only to translate and help them communicate with the local population.
Your question isn't formulated with enough information, but I'll try my best. Sensitivity levels is what I believe is the answer to this question. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
