Answer:
a random & coincidental occurrence
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Oleg's predictive accuracy can be attributed as being a random & coincidental occurrence. This is mainly due to the fact that making this prediction correctly 7 times in a row has extremely low odds of happening and those odds keep getting worse the more times he tosses the coin.
When putting together a puzzle with her son, Mim selects a puzzle that is slightly too difficult for him to put together alone and adjusts the support offered to her son to fit his current level of performance. Mim is engaging in scaffolding
<u>Explanation:</u>
The term refers to helping or supporting. In the example given, Mim's son is finding difficulties in join the puzzles. Hence, Mim offers help form his son. With that she adjusts to complete the puzzle. Here, with the support of Mim to his son and the efforts of both completes the puzzles.
Hence, we can conclude that Mim is engaging in Scaffolding. The completion of puzzles never happens neither with the effort of Mim nor with the effort of Mim's son. The efforts of Mim and her son together completes the puzzles.
Thanks you and yeah its easy..
<span>Add
Subtract
2 - 7(5 - (6x - 4))
2 - 7(5 - 6x + 4)
2 - 35 + 42x - 28
42x - 62</span>
The answer to number one is Mississippi