Answer:
C. The allotment of federal and state powers.
Explanation:
<u>Strict constructionists are those who follow or support the legal philosophy of limiting or restricting interpretations of judicial matters</u>. They believe in the literal interpretation of the laws and constitution, just as it is written or stated.
<u>Loose constructionists</u>, on the other hand, are the opposite of the strict constructionists. As is obvious, they <u>believe in the ability and possibility of interpreting the judicial constructs of the constitution, allowing for a broad interpretation and no specific restrictions.
</u>
One of the main points on which these <u>two groups of constructionists disagree the most on is the allotment of powers between the federal and state governments</u>. The issue of this allotment isn't clearly stated in the Constitution, which led to a wide range of interpretation from both sides, according to their own beliefs. While <u>the former group believes in the states to maintain the bulk of the power, the loose constructionist group believe in the federal side maintaining the bulk of power</u>.