1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alekssandra [29.7K]
3 years ago
7

Which legal school of thought is illustrated in this dialogue? DONUT DAY AT THE OFFICE Part 8 (Just then Calvin, the fit CEO, co

mes jogging into the room with a water bottle in hand. He spots the donuts and shows his disgust.) Calvin: Why do people inflict such nasty, sugar-coated poison on all of us?! A healthy workplace is a happy workplace. (He takes both boxes of donuts, puts them in a small, dirty, battered trash can and steps on them to squash them down, making them suddenly inedible. He smiles at everyone as if they all agree that he has done them a great service.) That's my job as CEO, to help everyone realize a long and happy life! Cheers! (He runs from the room as everyone looks on in stunned silence. After a couple of seconds Bob collapses on the floor next to the garbage can, looking at the destroyed donuts as if they were a long-lost love.) End Part 8
Command school of thought.

Sociological school of thought.

Law and economics school of thought.

Legal realism school of thought.
Law
1 answer:
Tamiku [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I would say that this dialogue makes reference to the third option.

Explanation:

law and economics school of thought deals with the management of markets and they regulate consumption between people and how they respond to market transactions. In this example when Calvin says "Why do people inflict such nasty, sugar-coated poison on all of us?! A healthy workplace is a happy workplace"

You might be interested in
The law making process is similar in the House and Senate with slight
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

Both houses must accept the bill

Explanation:

Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.

6 0
3 years ago
What California law did the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturn?
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

Brown v. Entertainment in 2011

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
According to the chart, with which countries did the US have a trade surplus in 2015? Check all that apply. Japan Australia Braz
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

Its B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Which of the following is an advantage of CAD (Computer Aided Dispatch) systems?
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: B: reduces voice traffic between dispatch and field units

Explanation:

Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) is the use of an automated system to dispatch services that work with dispatches such as emergency vehicles, cabs, couriers and transport vehicles.

CAD reduces voice traffic between the dispatch and the field units because the conversation between the two are reduced on account of the dispatch being a computer that cannot/ will not have a conversation with the field units unless giving a location they have been dispatched to.  

8 0
3 years ago
Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A woman was standing in the aisle of a subway car and put her purse on the seat next to her. A man approached the woman from beh
    7·1 answer
  • What does recession mean
    7·1 answer
  • You answer a call from an existing client who has a hearing in 10 minutes. They are at the court house but they cannot find thei
    9·1 answer
  • Examples of constitutional law
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! GO TO OTHER QUESTIONS TOO!! Committing a hit-and-run in the state of Florida can lead to
    14·2 answers
  • This occurs when a country offers multiple parties the option to run for election?
    10·2 answers
  • Which is a true statement about James McCulloch of McCulloch v. Maryland?
    8·1 answer
  • If motor skills are distorted by drugs or alcohol, this may result in ...
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the primary reason for using juries in trials involving serious crimes? A. It limits the effect of cor
    12·2 answers
  • What is one of the disadvantages of getting a government-sponsored mortgage?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!