The given is called a writ of attachment or an order of attachment
.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
In the court of law the defendant is an individual or company accused for committing a crime. If the judge has pronounced a judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of any disputes which may be a settlement in the form of money or in the form of assets.
The plaintiff may take the help of the court or court appointed sheriff to settle the dues from defendant. So the court appointed officials will make use of their power and protect the assets being sold. And this court process is known as order of attachment.
The English Bill of Rights supported the following civil liberties for citizens:
- Defense against harsh penalty
- Possession of firearms
- The option of a jury trial Justification:
These three points support citizens with fair treatment and provide insurance for a decent standard of living. The first protects citizens from all forms of torture and mistreatment, the second permits gun ownership with the appropriate restrictions for regular citizens, and the third offers citizens with legal assistance if they are subjected to a procedure that must uphold all general rights.
In order to enshrine the rights of American citizens, the bill of rights was drafted. Additionally, it was done to prevent the government from encroaching on citizens' freedoms.
To know more about bill of rights: brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
Answer:
The types of damages that would be needed in order for them to be equally happy as they were before the garage fiasco are:
a) Compensatory damages
b) Consequential damages
Explanation:
a) Compensatory Damages are claims paid to directly to compensate the non-breaching party for the value of what was damaged, not done, or performed. For this purpose, compensatory damages will be equal to the cost of getting the garages fixed.
b) Consequential Damages address the costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of damages done to other facilities. Example, the sliding off of the garage could have led to flood water damaging some other property, which were not the direct subject of the claim.
I believe there was one, which was a legislative branch. There were state run governments. But the states ultimately had more power than the federal government.