All categories

2 years ago

The supreme court case worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the cherokee nation in georgia because it

Law

1 answer:

Blababa [14]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The Case of the Supreme Court Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee nation in Georgia because it was decided that Georgia laws did not apply to Cherokee territory.

Explanation:

In the Worcester case v. Georgia, the Supreme Court denied Georgia jurisdiction and state authority over the Cherokee community. In other words, this meant that Georgia law and authority did not apply to Cherokee territory. Although this decision was a small victory for the Cherokee people, the decision was not very helpful as the state of Georgia totally ignored the Supreme Court decision and forced the Cherokee community to march west.

You might be interested in

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and w

Svetllana [295]

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and work papers for at least five years.

Option d

<u>Explanation: </u>

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 is a federal act providing rigorous auditing of government corporations ' banking regulations. Legislators also produced legislation to ensure safety for investors, employees and the community from accounting irregularities and dishonest financial practices.

Sarbanes-Oxley offers for a new act entitled "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act 2002" (CCFA Act), which promises to change federal criminal law to the following:

Prohibit anyone from intentionally changing, damage, mutilation, and covering, cover-up, falsifying or accessing any documents in a matter that is within the competence of any government agency or any federal bankrupt case, obstructing or affecting an inquiry.
Forbid an auditor from intentionally or inadvertently not holding any inspection or examination papers relating to a government undertaking over a five-year period although it's not a felony for Sarbanes-Oxley to hold these working papers for at least 5 years, over seven years, the auditors must retain their records.

8 0

3 years ago

Johnny loses his case in an Ohio trial court. He wishes to appeal his case decision. Which section of the diagram represents the

Vikentia [17]

Answer:

A: STATE TRIAL COURTS

B: INTERMEDIATE APPELATE COURTS

C: STATE SUPREME COURTS

D: U.S. SUPREME COURT

E: U.S. COURT OF APPEAL

F: U.S DISTRICT COURTS

1) ANSWER: B

After the state court he should request hearing from The Intermidiate Apellate Courts.

2) ANSWER: B

After the state court he should request hearing from The Intermidiate Apellate Courts.

3) ANSWER: D

The supreme court of justice has jurisdiction over ALL of the mentioned courts in the country.

4) ANSWER: D

The supreme court of justice has jurisdiction over ALL of the mentioned courts in the country.

5) ANSWER: A,B,C

A: State trial courts. B: Intermediate appellate courts. C: State Supreme Courts

6. ANSWER:

F: Federal courts that hear cases for the first time are the U.S District courts.

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

7 0

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP

Bas_tet [7]

No
republican super majority
lobbying
many times people in government vote for something because their allies are voting for it/they feel pressured

5 0

3 years ago

Free brainlyest first answer

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Yeeeeee me plsss I beg you

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

if a cop proceeds to pull me over for going over the speed limit and ask “Sir, do you know how fast you were going”, do i then h

nirvana33 [79]

I would reply with “no sir how fast was I going” so that it can not be used against you in court you have to remember anything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law in court you would want to ask for what proof he has that you were speeding

6 0

3 years ago