The supreme court case worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the cherokee nation in georgia because it

Law

1 answer:

Blababa [14]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The Case of the Supreme Court Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee nation in Georgia because it was decided that Georgia laws did not apply to Cherokee territory.

Explanation:

In the Worcester case v. Georgia, the Supreme Court denied Georgia jurisdiction and state authority over the Cherokee community. In other words, this meant that Georgia law and authority did not apply to Cherokee territory. Although this decision was a small victory for the Cherokee people, the decision was not very helpful as the state of Georgia totally ignored the Supreme Court decision and forced the Cherokee community to march west.

You might be interested in

What is your opinion or belief as to the Electoral College vote process for the Presidential Elections?

stiks02 [169]

I personally disagree with the Electoral College. It was a system that worked 200 years ago. The system now just doesn’t work because we have all these things like mail in voting, claimed election fraud, etc. Not only that but the electoral college could have a bias against a candidate. If you look at Hilary Clinton for example. She ran for President in 2016 but ended up losing the Electoral College vote but won the popular vote. Now she is an electoral college member which obviously, she wouldn’t vote for trump. The only reason the Electoral College is because the original framers said that the president and Vice President should be decided by a set group of people. Which today, is the Electoral College. Hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago

If you needed to raise money on your visits, which three districts would you visit? What information influenced your decision? W

GrogVix [38]

2, 3, 4

the crime rates

unemployment

4 0

2 years ago

Loyalty to WHICH governing model was displaced by ideas advanced in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S Constitution?

LiRa [457]

<em>The monarchy, or rule by divine right of a king</em>, was displaced by the ideas advanced in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The ideas expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution asserted the people’s right to govern themselves in opposition to the divine right of kings on which the monarchy was based.

6 0

2 years ago

In 2009, which case qualified the earlier New York v. Belton court decision on conducting searches in the passenger compartments

insens350 [35]

Answer:

Arizona v. Gant

Explanation:

Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.

3 0

3 years ago

Impaired drivers are one of many risks drivers on the highway transportation system. List 3 ways that a driver could be potentia

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer Some signs of impaired drivers are improper lane use, failure to signal, or unpredictable stopping and swerving of the car. These are just some of the signs that a driver may be impaired if you do see these signs on the road try to keep as much space possible between you and the car who demonstrates these signs.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago