Answer: Changes in quality of life.
Explanation:
The transition from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic can be characterized as a huge progress in humankind's development. The man of the Old Stone Age (Paleolithic) led a nomadic lifestyle, continuously changing his place of residence. The primary reason for this is the search for food or hunting. It was a very uncertain process for Paleolithic man, and people then lived in small social communities. Such a lifestyle intensely called into question the survival of the community. The paleolithic man used the rough-hewn stone as a tool and weapon.
In the Neolithic, man organizes an evening of social communities. In these communities, a certain type of social organization has had a positive impact on life. These permanent dwellings made by man were called pile dwelling and dugouts. Man thus no longer had to lead a nomadic lifestyle. His daily life was also facilitated because he grew food, certain domesticated plants, and animal species, so he did not have to look for food. In the Neolithic, he used finely worked stone, which was also an improvement in the quality of tools and weapons.
Answer:The central government is divided into three separate branches
Explanation: It is divided into the executive, judicial, and legislative branches. The purpose of the 3 branches is so that they each can ensure one another is being constitutional in a process known as checks and balances.
The approach to <u>moral-rights ethics</u> will be used when a decision is deemed immoral because it violates someone’s right.
<h3>What is moral-rights ethics?</h3>
A moral rights is concerned with the belief of what is morally good and bad and morally right and wrong
The ethics of moral rights seeks to establish a guideline of how moral right will be pursued.
In conclusion, the approach to <u>moral-rights ethics</u> will be used when a decision is deemed immoral because it violates someone’s right.
Read more about moral-rights ethics
<em>brainly.com/question/18401975</em>
<span>The idea that gifted children are maladjusted is a myth, as Lewis Terman found when he conducted an extensive study of 1,500 children whose Stanford-Binet IQs averaged 150.
</span><span>Terman's study included children, who were socially well adjusted, and many went on to become successful doctors, lawyers, professors, and scientists.</span>
