Fundamental attribution error defines a tendency to underestimate the effects of external or situational causes of behavior and to overestimate the effects of internal or personal causes.
Fundamental attribution error (FAE), also referred to as correspondence bias or attribution effect in social psychology, is the propensity for people to overemphasise dispositional and personality-based explanations for an individual's observed behaviour while underplaying situational and environmental explanations. The term "tendency to believe that what people do reflects who they are" has been used to characterise this effect, which is the tendency to overattribute people's actions (what they do or say) to their personalities and underattribute them to the circumstance or context. The mistake is in assuming that someone's actions are exclusively indicative of their personality rather than that they are partly indicative of it and primarily by external factors.
Learn more about Fundamental attribution error
brainly.com/question/15466443
#SPJ4
<span>I believe it is Saudi Arabia.</span>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
the founding documents for the United States relied on a lot of enlightenment ideas
This is most likely because of the ease when making judicial rulings. If there is an odd number of judges, then there will rarely be a tie vote. This can only occur when judges decide to abstain from voting. Most likely, the current court has an odd number of Justices to prevent an evenly split decision.
I believe the answer is: volunteer, communications, and fund-raiser
The volunteer would played roles as the front people during the campagin. Their jobs would be revolved around increasing the popularity of the candidates through things such as making posters or handing out pins.
Communications people would handle media related campaign and fund raiser would be the one that help the candidate collecting the money to be used for the campaign.
