Answer:
True
Explanation:
In a bit to fight poverty that ravages different areas, the government do come up with unique progammes that arev specifically designed to help the poor. Taxes are gotten from more financially prosperous families in order to finance these programmes and these and many more, have prompted different economists to disagree on the role the government should play to fight poverty.
The debate by these economists forms the question being asked here on the elimination of poverty not being a good the private market can provide. The answer is true.
It is also good for one to know that the poor would certainly be better off because they would enjoy a much improved standard of living while those contributing to the taxes on their own would enjoy living in a society with less poverty.
Answer:
they were taking up there land and kicking the off ther land so they could colonize
Explanation:
Let's look at the meaning of the four terms:
opportunity cost - this is a cost of an option not chosen, upon the choise of some option.
surplus - this is a situation where more goods are offered than are needed
<span>shortage - t</span><span>his is a situation where less goods are offered than are needed
price fixing
- this is an agreement between competitors to not lower a prize for a certain product.
So the correct answer is surplus!
</span>