1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
german
3 years ago
8

How much of britain’s economy was dependent upon the slave trade?

History
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago
3 0

"Britain, the 'nefarious trade' and slavery

Britain followed in the footsteps of the Portuguese in voyaging to the west coast of Africa and enslaving Africans. The British participation in what has come to be called the 'nefarious trade' was begun by Sir John Hawkins with the support and investment of Elizabeth I in 1573. (15) By fair means and foul, Britain outwitted its European rivals and became the premier trader in the enslaved from the seventeenth century onwards, and retained this position till 1807. Britain supplied enslaved African women, men and children to all European colonies in the Americas.

The 'Slave Coast' came to be dotted with European forts, their massive guns facing out to sea to warn off rival European slave traders. Each 'castle' incorporated prisons or 'barracoons' in which the enslaved women, children and men were kept, awaiting purchase by the traders, who could initially only reach the coast at those times of the year when the winds blew in the right direction. The prisons – without sanitation, with little air – must have been hell-holes in the humid coastal climates. The death rates are not known.

The trade became a very lucrative business. Bristol grew rich on it, then Liverpool. London also dealt in slaves as did some of the smaller British ports. (16) The specialised vessels were built in many British shipyards, but most were constructed in Liverpool. Laden with trade goods (guns and ammunition, rum, metal goods and cloth) they sailed to the 'Slave Coast', exchanged the goods for human beings, packed them into the vessels like sardines and sailed them across the Atlantic. On arrival, those left alive were oiled to make them look healthy and put on the auction block. Again, death rates (during the voyage) are unknown: one estimate, for the 1840s, is 25 per cent.

Plantation and mine-owners bought the Africans – and more died in the process called 'seasoning'. In the British colonies the slaves were treated as non-human: they were 'chattels', to be worked to death as it was cheaper to purchase another slave than to keep one alive. Though seen as non-human, as many of the enslaved women were raped, clearly at one level they were recognised as at least rapeable human beings. There was no opprobrium attached to rape, torture, or to beating your slaves to death. The enslaved in the British colonies had no legal rights as they were not human – they were not permitted to marry and couples and their children were often sold off separately.

Historian Paul Lovejoy has estimated that between 1701 and 1800 about 40 per cent of the approximately more than 6 million enslaved Africans were transported in British vessels. (It must be noted that this figure is believed by some to be a considerable underestimate.) Lovejoy estimated that well over 2 million more were exported between 1811 and 1867 – again, many believe the numbers were much greater. (17)"



You might be interested in
Do you think feudalism helped or hurt western Europe's development
Reil [10]
This is a very difficult question and one that is heavily debated today, but the general consensus is that although feudalism was initially helpful at protecting the unprotected in society, it overall held Europe back from economic and social development since there was no upward mobility.
8 0
4 years ago
how did the code of Indian Offenses try to force native Americans to assimilate in terms of funeral and mourning practices
Sonja [21]

Answer:

The code of Indian Offenses restricted the religious and cultural ceremonies of Native American tribes.

Explanation:

The major objective was cultural assimilation.

3 0
2 years ago
How did the currency act make the stamp act more difficult for the colonists?
adelina 88 [10]

The outcome was that the British Parliament passed the 1764 Currency Act which prohibited the states from giving paper cash and made colonists pay their debts and taxes more difficult. Soon after Parliament passed the Currency Act, Prime Minister Grenville proposed a Stamp Tax.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament on March 22, 1765. The new expense was forced on every American settler and expected them to pay duty on each bit of printed paper they utilized.

The British Parliament passed the 1764 Currency Act which precluded the settlements from money and made pioneers pay their  debts and taxes become more difficult.

In this climate, Parliament passed two acts to expand the drained salary of Britain and its shippers. The Currency Act prohibited the states' printing their very own paper cash.

In any case, homesteaders demanded that without their very own paper cash they couldn't keep up incredible monetary action. So the pilgrims welcomed the appearance of the stamps with brutality and financial counter.

8 0
3 years ago
Imagine it is late 1787. Your town is holding a community picnic to show support for the new government. You are one of a very f
poizon [28]
It's 1787 and there are many people coming up to this picnic, I'm deeply quiet because I am one of very few people who know this secret.... I have heard we are having this picnic to support the new government today! Which to me is bright and harmful to hear. But I shall not spill this huge secret to anyone but myself. So, I sit here in this wooden chair feasting with a bunch of neighbors. Daring not to spill one of the most important secrets ever! 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how National Rivalries were the reason for European imperialism?
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

HERE YOU GO HOPE THIS HELPS

Explanation:

The European imperialist push into Africa was motivated by three main factors, economic, political, and social. It developed in the nineteenth century following the collapse of the profitability of the slave trade, its abolition and suppression, as well as the expansion of the European capitalist Industrial Revolution also Five Motives for Imperialism. Various motives prompt empires to seek to expand their rule over other countries or territories. These include economic, exploratory, ethnocentric, political, and religious motives.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main reason that the southern economy remained largely agricultural?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the market revolution affect the lives of artisans?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the correct use of the word “emerged”?
    11·2 answers
  • In ancient china workshops burial grounds and homes of workers were usually located _____
    13·1 answer
  • Ohhhhh I have a Brainliest for anyone who can answer this history question
    14·1 answer
  • After WWII, the US aided __________ in its efforts to keep control of Vietnam.
    13·1 answer
  • Who became a leader of the women’s suffrage movement after helping draft the Declaration of Sentiments? Jeannette Rankin Elizabe
    10·2 answers
  • What were negative aspects of Joseph Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan? Check all that apply. decline of infrastructure shortage of
    13·2 answers
  • MAXIMUM POINTS WILL GIVE BRAINIEST, FULL ANSWERS ONLY, WRONG ANSWERS WILL BE REPORTED
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following were NOT uses of the stars to ancient humans?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!