Which BEST describes the effect of confining the story's action to an hour's time? A) It allows the reader to understand how qui
ckly everything can change in one's life. B) None of these choices describe the effects of confining the story's action to an hour. C) It allows the reader to understand that the characters will in fact live long, happy lives. D) It allows the reader to flashback to an earlier time to better understand the feelings of the characters.
D) It allows the reader to flashback to an earlier time to better understand the feelings of the characters.
Explanation:
Confining the story to one hour can be very beneficial for the reader to understand the story and the action of the characters much more efficiently. This is because it allows the reader to search for information previously mentioned to remember how certain actions are influencing the story. With this, the reader can identify important facts, relevant characters and how the narration of the story builds everything that is happening.
Thus, the reader has a complete experience that allows him to see the story cohesively in a shorter period of time, without leaving him tired or bored.
Skepticism is an essential thinking used by every researcher to discover the endless line of unknowns behind the knowns. It is an attitude that is refusing to believe the what is now and strives to prove the existence of the counterparts and contraries. It leads eventually to the better understanding of truth.
Magna Carta, written in 1215, established the belief that the monarch's rule was not absolute and provided the basis for the later development of parliament.<span> The document only forced King John to consult nobles before he made arbitrary decisions like passing taxes.</span>
