The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
The reason why business fail is because they find it extremely hard to compete with the well known business. for example a man that opens up a buisiness that sells soap and decides to name the soap and company labbi but everyone goes to dove because it's more well known and been out for years and delivers high quality
Answer:
The resulting rise in unemployment is mostly a rise in __cyclical____ unemployment because it is related to the state of the economy.
Explanation:
Frictional unemployment occurs as a result of workers' search for or transition to new jobs. It is brief and does not leave a mark on the economy. Structural unemployment comes about when the skills of workers do not match the requirements of employers. Therefore, workers require retraining and reskilling. Cyclical unemployment relates to the macro-economic situation that is prevailing during periods of recession.
Answer:
c. lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because they take the same amount of money from both poor and rich.
Explanation:
To understand this question, you have to first understand what lump-sum taxes are.
Lump-sum taxes are a system of taxes where everybody pays the same amount of tax no matter their economic status, or their actions. Basically, lump-sum taxes take the same amount of money from the rich and the poor, hugely increasing the burden on the poor and lessening that of the rich.
As an example, a lump-sum tax of $100 would require everybody to pay $100. To a person earning, say $120, that would be a huge hit, and be a huge burden on his normal life. However, to a rich person who earns, say, $10000, that would be much more easier for the rich person.
Hence, lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because of the unfair advantage the rich have over the poor in tax-paying.
Hope this helped!
