Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute m=8 into the equation
Firstly deal with the bracket
then multiplication
then division
2(11)/11
Answer:
68
Step-by-step explanation:
all explanation you need in the page above
brainliest please
Let i = sqrt(-1) which is the conventional notation to set up an imaginary number
The idea is to break up the radicand, aka stuff under the square root, to simplify
sqrt(-8) = sqrt(-1*4*2)
sqrt(-8) = sqrt(-1)*sqrt(4)*sqrt(2)
sqrt(-8) = i*2*sqrt(2)
sqrt(-8) = 2i*sqrt(2)
<h3>Answer is choice A</h3>
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
Answer:
Option A
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of the big Square is 216.
the Smaller Square is 9
subtract both of those, you get option A, 207.
have an amazing day!
