This is an opinion so I’m pretty sure you can choose whatever. As long as it falls under that category. Correct me if I’m wrong
2. D
he really was personal and to himself and didn’t believe in that
Answer:
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Bills just aren't sharp enough or tough enough or whatever enough to beat playoff teams
Explanation:
B) Control of the abuse of power
This would also be considered “checks and balances.” The president “checks” Congress by vetoing bills if he feels the need to do so.
